This post is to not only show you things that may have never occurred to your mind, but also to show you how to solve problems, piece together information, and realize things. You see, all this time I’ve been solving problems for you all, as well as solving information and puzzles. This leads me to further conclusions. The more information I have, the better my conclusions become. It’s just like a jigsaw puzzle. I am trying to teach you how to think, along with a lot of other things. This one post should be enough for me to show you how to do anything you want to do with this world. But you’re going to have to see what I’m doing here, how I’m doing it. A lot of this stuff hasn’t been studied yet – but that’s not the point. Some of this stuff would only occur to a child – but you would then miss the point. If you want more information, just search for it. There are so many ideas – the best and worst coming from people who barely know the subject. If you can imagine that so many people don’t know how to create new things these days, and that they are repeating the same stuff over and over, that history repeats itself, that we are being redundant – I am not only showing you how but why. The mind needs to change. This post should show you how…
Something to consider while reading this long post – a lot of this stuff hasn’t been studied, and has not occurred to anyone yet. But it has occurred to me, several times. Be a little careful reading this – it can be a lot of ‘lightbulbs’ going off at once. So if one or a few lightbulbs go off for you, and your brain gets excited – stop reading for a while until you have settled down, and revisit. This is full of deep, confusing logic, which can be hard for the weak minded. That’s not to call you weak, it’s just that you’re not used to this kind of thinking.
As such, if you start getting dizzy, just calm down, stop reading for a while, and come back and slowly finish. If you find yourself starting to think in a circular fashion – realize that’s an error in thinking. It’s called circular logic, and is a fallacy because it’s an error in thinking. The best way to stop that is to realize what you are doing and just stop thinking that way – it’s a mistake, an error. So please do not freak out at this, or if you can’t handle it, do not read it all at once. Not everyone can handle thinking like this, and a lot of you won’t understand this…
Ready? Here we go…
[Edit - December 2013] First I need to explain to you that I am not writing a scientific research paper here – so I am not bound to the scientific process. As such, the scientific process and other forms of science starts with a theory, as I posit here in places. You see, a theory is a conclusion drawn from observations. So is an opinion. Therefore, a theory is the same as someone’s opinion based on their observations – which can be facts, figures, statistics, what you can see, feel, touch, smell, or can otherwise test out by any means currently available. Theories get validated by discussion, testing, and mathematics. If you are picking up on what I’m putting down here, it should be obvious that generally someone doesn’t just come up with some random equasion and say ‘this is what it means’.
[Edit - cont'd] Rather, they start with a theory that is based on other validated theories (like evolution), and those validated theories lead to further questions, and other theories. Then they use mathematics to see if it fits. I will explain how that works later. Then they may run further tests to further the evidence for the theory, until most agree that the theory is indeed valid. Finally, even validated theories may be incorrect in some way or we begin to find out more, and those theories are then re-challenged and retested; potentially revising the theory. Is there any way to be 100% certain that a theory is a fact? Where we are nearly 100% certain, we usually call these ‘the law of _____’ (like the ’2nd law of thermodynamics’ or the ‘laws of conservation of mass or energy’)…
[Edit - cont'd] These things said, if there is any question about what I am talking about, I usually give the general knowledge or description of the observation or prior theory – I leave it to you to look that up if you don’t know what I’m talking about. The reason is once you understand the various pieces to this particular puzzle, you’ll begin to understand where my conclusions (opinions) are coming from, and further start to see the bigger picture as I am starting to see it. Really – knowledge and the thirst for knowledge is an amazing thing. I can’t believe that so many people are only interested in amusement, entertainment, and things that are fun or funny – that doesn’t progress your mind or do any real benefit to society, and only chasing after entertainment is only a continuance of your childhood days, in other words, if you find yourself only chasing for fun and hardly ever searching for knowledge – grow the f*** up – life is hardly ever about how much fun you can have, or even how much of anything you can have – life is about enjoying what’s good in it – and currently, what I find most rewarding is the search for knowledge….
On with my discussion, now that I’ve cleared up the difference between conclusions/theories/opinions and facts/figures/observations! (And the fact that I’m not writing this with the intention that it will be published in some scientific journal – I just want to spur discussion and ideas)
Why am I saying now that combinatorics is the secret to furthering our understanding of not only various fields of mathematics, but it may also unlock previously unsolvable problems according to chemistry, astrophysics, and particle physics, as well as other areas under my direct interest like computer science??
Because of a recent article that came out on number theory back in 2011. (Keep in mind, while the math is currently sometimes beyond me if I don’t also read up on all the background to it, I can at least understand equasions – as well as their implications to various fields – and am quite capable at putting all the pieces together for you, in fact, solving puzzles, information, and other observations are my speciality according to IQ tests)…
This article -> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/partition-numbers-fractals/
Researchers have found a fractal pattern underlying everyday math. In the process, they’ve discovered a way to calculate partition numbers, a challenge that’s stymied mathematicians for centuries….
“It was like living in a darkened home for years, and then finally someone turned on the lights. When Zach and I realized the structure, we knew we were right,” Ono wrote in an e-mail to Wired.com. “We see the same mathematical structures over and over and over again, similar to how you see repeating elements in the Mandelbrot set as you fly through it. That’s why we say they’re fractal,” he said.
In a separate paper, Ono and Jan Hendrik Bruinier of Germany’s Darmstadt Technical University describe a function, deemed “P,” that can churn out any integer’s partition number.
The combined research doesn’t quite reveal a mathematical representation of the universe’s structure, Ono said, but it does kill partition numbers as a way to encrypt computer data.
“Nobody’s ever going to do that now, since we now know partition numbers aren’t random,” Ono said. “They’re completely predictable and we should no longer pretend they’re mysterious.”
What’s the significance of this? Much larger than one would imagine.. You may have noticed – ‘it does kill partition numbers as a way to encrypt computer data’. What does that mean? This study not only has impacts on encryption, but hashing algorithms as well.
You see, with one-way hashes and data set hash functions – this research explains why there are vulnerabilities in creating hashes of files. It tells us why we can only arrive at a certain degree of randomness. When I did my own studies into compressing files to tiny sizes, even though I now know I can compress any size of file down to only 1 bit, I cannot go in reverse. To do so would be like traveling back in time – it’s a paradox in numbers. But if you leave a trail, you can at least go back, but then it becomes impossible to do compression..
I realized that there are literally endless ways you can do this – all by re-arranging the binary to form new patterns that can be compressed with the same length of binary that you used, resulting in any number of bytes – meaning it can be repetitively done. If you would study the innards of data hashes, like MD5 (which is much easier to understand) and work your way to something like SHA-256, you would realize it is actually not a huge accomplishment, if you realize that this can be done in endless ways. It just happens that the only accomplishment in them is to achieve a certain degree of randomness, and collision avoidance. But Ono proves the ‘error in our ways’…
This article explains not only why we have troubles with collisions in hashing, but also how we have collisions in hashing – you see, we are basically, with any form of hash code or function (data set hashing vs data hashes), we are basically just folding bits and bytes and shuffling parts around to enable us to achieve a certain degree of randomness. However, there is no one hash function that does achieve a perfect randomness. That’s why we have collisions.
Ono explains ‘[we found out that eventually, every sequence of numbers in a partition form a pattern]‘. That one discovery led them to the fact that hashing will never deliver any great degree of true randomness unless we now start basing it off of pi (which I now know to either be the only true random sequence of numbers or forms the longest pattern of numbers – you can continuously calculate it if you are in computer science and have an easy thesis if you want). Ono further explains ‘[we should stop pretending that primes (used as hash table sizes when hashing data sets, or calculating iterative hash codes), somehow magically creates randomness, and are themselves not in any way random]‘. With encryption – the same – it tells us not only that our foundations of building these techniques are flawed – but why. There actually are no random numbers! Even numbers are not random. Odd numbers are not random. Prime numbers do not create much more randomness! We are just basically delusional about it, and this new find in number theory explains perfectly why..
You may have noticed his other statement ‘we now know partition numbers aren’t random.’ What does that mean? To computer science, in my own research I was finding patterns to solving the same problem in different ways – about 200 different ways.. I didn’t know why some of my solutions were unsolvable. Now I do. I kept running into collisions in binary pattern and numbers.
You see, partition numbers are numbers that add up to another, larger number. This makes it fit into combinatorics, because so does packing, and this is a number packing problem – a packing problem with numerics instead of objects and dimensions. A lot of other fields base their math on combinatorics and number theory – from packaging to physics.
Remember – the partitions form a larger number or itself, therefore, they are a bigger version of the parts that make it up as a whole. If you follow me, what’s 1+1? 2. What’s 2+5? 7. But what is 2+5? It goes back to the origins of math: 1+1, + 1+1+1+1+1 = 7. Or we could say 1+1, + 1+3+1 = 7. This is the basis of combinatorics, and is much like partitions (partitions are the number of ways a certain number can be represented by any format of other number(s), where order doesn’t matter and repetition of numbers are allowed, whereas compositions are the same only order does matter – greatly increasing the factorial growth of the number of possible ways to represent the number 10, even – if you want to see for yourself, go to google and search ‘combinatorics wolfram alpha’, and calculate something).
See it now? In other words, what Ono & company found out was that it is not only likely but inevitable that given enough numbers, we reach a pattern eventually – it means we are finding patterns in groupings of numbers. Then, we find that prime numbers, even numbers, odd numbers, unique numbers – in an infinite set these all can form fractals. What does a fractal mean? It’s like looking at the universe with the naked eye, then through a telescope, then through a NASA telescope out in orbit. Everything is a part of something bigger, according to number theory, and further, you can zoom in and out – that led to their discovery, a finite equation to calculate any ‘normal’ size of partition result, denoted as ‘p’…
What else does this mean? I’m going to dive into science and physics for a while now and out of computer science…
Any positive whole number, by itself, is part of a larger fractal. This means that every positive integral number – is indeed, a part of a fractal. What’s further is my understanding of computing – it’s binary. This means that anything we represent as a number, can mean anything else given a different definition of what that binary represents. It furthers that any piece of information can be represented by numbers. This is how any theory can be described with math, if you know calculus and are well-enough equipped to come up with an equasion for it (an equasion in math to represent something real – since anything can be described in math, it follows logically that anything can also be described as a single number).
Computer programming makes it possible to solve similar problems without ever having to come up with an actual equasion for it all.. This is where we replace mathematics with logical structure, so to computer programmers it is far easier to solve a given problem in terms of a computer algorithm or in computer code than it is to come up with an equasion or a set of equasions for it all. But if you knew your computer code well enough (look very closely) – you can actually create one huge equasion for any computer program! It’s just that it would be impossibly hard to read and understand in terms of math… Onward, we march!
It further means that if you account for the fact that 64 bits results in a very huge number (approx 1.5 E 19, or 1 with some form of 19 other digits), this one article is made up of probably over 10,000,000 bits of binary information. Representing that as one number is obviously possible, but the string of numerics would be about as long as this page – meaning it would be a huge, huge number that you would never understand, is astronomically large, and uncalculable by any machine or person on earth (Actually, we could just use every bit 0-8 to represent a number from 1-256, and just print out those numbers iteratively, but that doesn’t mean it is by any means feasible to perform any calculations on it… I hope now you’re seeing the real power of computing – btw – imagine that most of this heavy math was done before computers – by hand. That’s just amazing… Are you still thinking that somehow we’ve evolved so much since even 0AD that we’re somehow smarter or deeper than people were back then – even with all the poisons of alcohol and drugs you put your brains through and pass on to your kids?? ). Again – Onwards!
But breaking it down into smaller parts, as in combinatorics, we can see that even though making one number represent my entire speech on this page is astronomically large, the human mind can understand it if we break it down into smaller chunks. Indeed, what you all have done is solve pieces to a large puzzle. But you fail to pay attention to other disciplines and other people’s works. That’s where you generate further ideas, and further your own theories and works. Here’s where I really bust your noggin’….
That indeed follows that similarly, if we break down the universe, this planet, and things that were previously un-imaginable to represent in math, into smaller chunks of information or smaller pieces – we can solve those different parts, put it all together, understand it and it will still be correct! The reality is, just like Stephen Hawking wanted to see one equasion to describe the entire universe, there exists such an equasion. But the equasion would be huge and almost impossible to understand. But look at all the pieces to the puzzle we have here – do you really need to see one big, confusing equasion to see the big picture? The reality is, I’ve known about this stuff ever since watching physics shows and news, and I’ve just been waiting for the day to know how to tell you so you don’t look at me like ‘a mad scientist’…
If you still don’t understand me, think of it like this: We now know that any number is a part of something bigger. The same applies to chemistry, biology, physics – any discipline. What this means is that we are correct in our assumptions. One is that if you study (Saturn I think – one theory is that by studying the planet’s storms you can get a better idea of what goes on in the sun, rather than studying what you cannot in the sun directly – that is indeed correct!), you can learn about what goes on in the sun easier. If you study suns, you can learn what goes on in black holes. If you study smaller black holes, you can further your understanding of larger black holes. You see where I’m getting at? Everything is all a part of something bigger, it’s all correlated, and it’s all, even though you may find it strange to some degree, very similar – from an atom and particles (made up of quarks which seem to follow no rules like left/right/up/down, etc.), to chemical compounds, to black holes.
(Imagine this for a second with quarks – the smallest known piece of matter. They don’t have any laws like left/right/up/down, etc. But if you think of what we know about us, our planet, gravity, and the universe – we only have a perception of what is left/right/up/down. To yourself, the left hand is on your left. But to someone else looking at you, your left hand is on your right. To you, you are standing upright. But which way is up? If we are all rotating around the earth, how do we know when we are actually pointing up? We also don’t know if we are on the left – it just seems that way. Is it any wonder quarks behave this way? Even with our own galaxy – it has a black hole at the center, with every solar system rotating around it like one big disk – not a big sphere. But we are at a different angle than ‘amdromidon’, another galaxy that’s supposed to collide with us. To us, it looks tilted. So which way is actually up? The answer is, there is no such thing – it’s a matter of perception. Just like so many other things. Once you learn the difference, you realize a lot…)
So if the math it comes down to is bigger than you can calculate, simply break it into smaller pieces of math, different sections, just like we do when we’re trying to create a big software package – and it will still be correct math! Then when you piece it back together, you can see bigger pictures – the whole of the parts! It’s immensely interesting – it’s like these guys have found a new ‘law’ in the universe, I will explain what I mean below….
What I mean by a new law is this: Not only imagine that everything is part of something bigger, but inevitably forms patterns! Then is it any wonder or is it in any way mysterious that there are ‘ice volcanoes’ on our own solar system? Is it not the inverse of a lava volcano on earth? You see – simply following math, we can see the patterns here, in other planets in our own solar system, our understanding of the big and the small – and this should lead to a realization – and that realization should lead to an explosion of understanding of our reality – our own universe!
Are you starting to see the significance of this yet? It means the only number that seemingly follows no number (is not part of a fractal and is completely seemingly random, with no apparent or discernable pattern in its numerics, or for some reason is an equally important discovery because it may form the longest string of non-pattern digits) is now known to be ‘pi’. What does the number pi form on a graph? It forms a circle. (Correction – pi forms distances of different circles. In essence, it is creating a bigger and bigger version of itself, which should actually be its ‘pattern’; i.e. we haven’t found any discernable pattern in the numbers because the more we compute it out, it is just like calculating an even bigger circle or rather sphere…)
What should then happen if we were to continue calculating pi? It should eventually repeat itself in some way. It’s just that we either haven’t found out the way it repeats, because we are only looking at single digits, or we just haven’t calculated it out far enough yet. It’s unique in that it is now the only known number that is not part of a larger fractal, or it forms the largest fractal. But it’s a decimal number – so we don’t yet know what this means – but this definitely means it’s special. So is the speed of light, denoted as ‘c’.
You see, when I first started studying higher-level math, I was learning on my own. Naturally, I was immediately interested at first in Einstein’s equations about energy, general relativity, etc. But what I found when I went to other fields of study, like electricity – I started seeing the math equations becoming either redundant or forming similarity patterns. The only thing that seemed to be at the center of it all was Einstein’s constant – the speed of light – denoted as the variable ‘c^2′…
It was then a theory of mine that since we have this: E = mc^2. Therefore, according to algebra, we can do also do the following and they both should mean something significant: m = c^2/E, and c^2 = E/m (correction – it’s actually m = E/c^2, I just goofed in writing this and then confused myself – but it didn’t change what I was trying to tell you – I still remembered what it was..).
But do these equasions mean anything? Here, we have to understand both the equasion and Einstein. What did he say? Reality is an illusion. What do you get if you plug in numbers to m = c^2/E? There is no mass or energy if c^2 is zero. But c^2 is a constant – so is it possible to have zero for the speed of light? Who knows? (correction – I’ll show you. Here, we have c^2 = E/m. What happens if c^2 is 0? Everything disappears. But can c^2 = 0? No. Because if we re-arrange the equasion, we can see that by math we cannot divide by 0 – m = E/c^2 = error. Therefore, because of movement and gravity, things always exist, and never cease to exist. Indeed, that is why c^2 is the glue behind all of this – I would only like to know not only why, but how) We don’t fully understand the reality of light. But I understand probably more, just by thinking and solving puzzles like I do, and by watching video, than likely most physics students – the more information I get, the clearer the puzzle becomes…
You see, is light a particle or a photon or something physical? Not really. If it were, imagine that everything you see right now is possible because light is bouncing off of everything at every possible angle. Now imagine that when you see a star in the sky, it is only because the light it emits has beamed down interweaving through the fabric of space-time directly landing on your eyeball. Now imagine what an exact angle that must take. Think about it – how does the eye see? We know it is because light is striking our eyeballs at all these angles. What gives things color? Our light perceives that color based on how it strikes the object and bounces off of it. It’s not exactly that you are ‘seeing the object’ – it’s more the case that you are seeing the light come off of it, which allows you to see it. Get it now?
If light were a photon or a particle, it would logically follow that as that particle is emitted or hits anything, it would by necessity mean it divides itself infinite times – at every single possible angle. If a particle could do this, when they collided particles at CERN they should have seen a big sphere, not single particles.. That’s very impossible for any particle to do. Rather, light is like an energy wave – just like energy waves that we now know fill what we thought was an empty vacuum in space.
What do we also know about the statement ‘Reality is an illusion’? What do we know about physical objects today, if you’ve been paying attention to science and physics? We know that everything boils down to energy, and a seemingly endless amount of information can be imprinted and stored, spread out, over energy. Now, we have two ‘laws’ that state neither energy or matter can be destroyed? Why the latter? Doesn’t a black hole destroy matter? No – you see, matter is actually a cluster of energy – energy that has formed an object by clustering together and taking shape, then forming even more complex bonds – all the way from a simple grain of salt to your entire body. As it all boils down to energy, and energy is seemingly just an illusionary thing – reality is therefore a persistent illusion of energy! (Now don’t go thinking that somehow since reality is seemingly an illusion that means you are free to commit acts of crime against life – I will get to those secrets in another post – the idea with these two posts are to tell you things that have never occurred to you or other human minds)
[Edit - Please keep in mind I originally thought of doing the algebraic re-arrangements about 6-7 years ago. It made sense back then, but m = c^2/E didn't for some reason. Then I remembered something else I was thinking - that as time speeds up so does the speed of light. But it still didn't make sense, because this equasion would require astronomical speeds of light - and that isn't what I remembered it doing. Then I looked back at this post, and realized the actual equasion is m = E/c^2. Oooooooppps - that can happen when I'm writing, I'm a bad writer..... Now this will be much easier for me to explain - I remember it now...]
Who would think to re-arrange Einstein’s most basic equasion? Exactly, a child would. But a child does not have the other information necessary to understand what it means. An adult has that, by learning and information. But an adult would never think to do the former, because they do not have the creativity, or the mindset anymore, to know what this does – that was killed off in school by teaching everyone that the teacher has all the right answers, that there is only one correct answer to everything, and to never question authority figures. This gets reinforced in our society all the way through adulthood. Is it any wonder most people in developed nations do not know what to do about corruption or overbearing control, or how to solve real-world problems, or how to arrive at better societies, or how to listen to ideas and discuss them intelligently rather than just to try and win an argument, or the fact that 250,000,000 people with or without guns vs 125,000 people with planes, tanks, etc. can actually beat the latter quite easily – if they just went about it the right way?
Here, I am trying to show you not only how to solve problems, but I’m trying to give you enough information to see how my brain works – I am best at solving puzzles, information, charts, graphs, etc. I am worst at things like communication, vocabulary, and reading/writing. That makes some things kind of a crutch for me. I’m not as smart as Einstein was – that is certain. But just like Einstein – you all cannot tell the difference between smart and dumb, genius and insane, or good and bad.
To me, a lot of you look like an angry painter. You start painting, decide you don’t like it, and throw the whole thing away. The same is true of pharmacology (drugs), physics, mathematics, or any other form of invention. If you’ve ever tried to invent something – you would know it’s not only hard and takes a lot of time, especially if it’s something new, but you should realize that just because it currently doesn’t work doesn’t mean it never will. Imagine this – we are trying to work on ideas that gravity plays an effect on the speed of light. Why? Because gravity plays an effect on time. What else plays an effect on time? Motion. How fast you are moving. What can we conclude once we finish this? That time is based on how fast light is moving – they are synonyms. I will show you down the article how you can do this, and why.
Why do I say you are like angry painters? If you ever did art back in school, you would know that a lot of times, a mistake can be transformed into something wonderful. You never throw out a painting until you are done. The same is true of solving problems. You know somebody solved it one way – but instead of you solving it in a new way, it is easy for you to instead do something similar. That is what you were taught to do in school. It ruined your creativity. But you can recondition your minds.
Edison said, before he invented the lightbulb, that all his failures were actually successes – he said, I found about 200 different ways how not to create a lightbulb. I only needed one way to make it work. Did that mean his original idea was wrong – that a lightbulb was impossible? 200 failures might be pretty convincing. But you see, he was just missing information – pieces to the puzzle – observations. The more observations he got, the better his ideas became. As he observed, he not only learned more, but his ideas got not only better but more accurate.
This is how problem solving works, and similar to how science works. You may say philosophy is dead – but without philosophy, without the ideas, without creativity, without thought, without new things – there is no advancement. If you stop at A, you never go to B. If you stop asking questions, you never progress. Only you were taught never to question things. That’s why we are having so much problems right now – a lot of the best ways you used to think were obliterated. We are actually not smarter than we were in 0AD. We’ve been poisoning our brains for well over 2,000 years. That doesn’t make you smarter – it makes you dumber, progressively. The reality is, it could be the case they were smarter back then than we are today – it’s just that they didn’t have as much information available as we do today…
You see, once you understand this article – I am giving you not only answers that you never thought of, but also how to do this kind of stuff. These days, the smartest people are usually servants to people in power. People in power have a lot of money – which is what gives them power. But it is only a ‘percieved power’. Without the servants protecting them, they actually have no power at all. If you can find out how to correct the mistakes they have made on your behalf, and then move forward as one nation, and eventually as one people of a planet, you’ll see that you have broken a cycle – and that cycle was forced control, which led to corruption, which always leads to either the self-destruction of a nation, or the uprising of people who were backed into a really small corner. Either way, we can see that we cannot force control through fear of punishment – a better way is to make everyone just smart enough to ‘know the difference and understand’. That’s really all it takes – and it’s on all of you to start to do this.
The reason I say that we are progressing the wrong way is simple – people are not attracted to smart people. Some of the most brilliant people, especially today, are seen as insane just because you don’t understand what they are saying. It’s just like the explanation of why atheists like physics, a common saying is ‘physicists: just because you don’t understand what the f they are saying, doesn’t make you right’ What I am saying is back to the rest of you ‘Atheists: just because you take everything at face-value, and are good with arguments, doesn’t make you right either’ And no – Einstein wasn’t exactly an atheist all the time. What he said on the subject was ‘science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.’ You think you have disproven religion. But if you know what I am about to teach you, not only were the people back then better thinkers just lacking information, but they understood the mind much more and left behind better life-lessons than you ever did today. It doesn’t mean religion was bad – it just needs a reset, or correction, a little understanding – to transform the mistakes over time into something better. I’m doing this to both of you at once….
You see, our world is very rare. Consider for a moment that we’ve been trying to find life like ours in outer space. Have we found any? Nope. why? Because we haven’t had an answer. Consider this – what does our planet do on the opposite side of the sun, when it is night to us? It glows with light. So how do we know if there is intelligent life out there as advanced as ours? I would suggest you find a planet that is ‘glowing with light on it’s dark side’. So while it is hard for us to find life out there – it should be easy for other life to find us first. This tells us just how rare this is. We haven’t found life out there. Since we are more visible than any other planet – so too should other advanced life be visible to us in the same ways. The fact that neither of us have found each-other since the start of the light bulb means just how rare this thing is.. Now back to physics..
So take another look now at m = E/c^2. What do we know? It is the case that as Energy gets really large, m gets large, but at a smaller proportion. It’s the inverse of E = mc^2. But there’s still something I need to explain to you for this to work…
Imagine now that we look at c^2 = E/m, and back at E = mc^2. What do we know looking at these? We should first see with the original equasion that E increases at a faster rate than m. So what happens when we look at c^2 = E/m? It should be the case that as we plug in numbers, as energy increases, mass increases slightly, right? So in other words, the more collective mass and energy something has, we could make a guess that c^2 actually gets bigger as energy increases…
But is that true? We would have to do a ‘pretend’ example:
Let’s say for a moment that we are pretending c^2 is a constant – so we’ll say it is the number ’10′. What happens here is, if we know something’s mass, we can say ’2′ or ’3′. What happens here follows: E = mc^2. So if m = 2, E = 200. If m = 3, E = 300. The speed of light is denoted as c. What would happen if c^2 was actually a constant? Look here – c^2 = E/m. sqrt(200/2) = c = 10. sqrt(300/3) = c = 10. See – they are both the same. So this proves that c^2 is actually a constant – even as things gain mass. But in reality, it’s an illusion – it’s based on perception (you have to remember this equasion is always based on the perspective as if you are that energy and mass, so to you, c doesn’t change, when in reality, to different observers, it does)…
What do I mean? Is that possible? The reality is, we’ve already observed this. This is probably how Einstein came up with relativity….
You have to remember that the rate of c is relative to the observer. What happens if you are moving at 100 mph, and something else is moving at 10 mph? We know that for the former, c = (if it is ’10′) = 1,000. For the latter, c = 100. But what did you just see? For both observers of themselves, c looks like it is moving at exactly the same rate – 10 – just like what I just showed you with energy and mass (mass creates gravity). In other words, c looks exactly the same, from it’s own perspective – 10. But if one observer were able to actually see another, say the guy moving at 100 mph could actually visualize light moving past the 10 mph guy, they should observe the 10 mph guy’s light going past him at only 100 mph – instead of 1,000. If the 10 mph guy were able to see the 100 mph guy’s light travel, they would say light is moving past that guy at 1,000 mph, when for our case it’s moving past us at only 100 mph. See the real difference? To different observers, the difference in the speed of light from either perspective is exactly 900 mph. But this is going to take some further explanation.
How can this be the case, if c is a constant? Because if you could witness light doing this, you would see it happen before your eyes. It’s very difficult to design tests for this, and it’s much easier to design tests for things that we can see move around other things. It’s because when we are doing the tests, we are always doing them from the perspective as if we are that observation – just like how I showed you by re-arranging that equasion. Indeed, we have already seen this now…
What happens when a black hole gobbles up a light source, like a sun? It’s the only way we’ve been able to observe this with our own eyes. It doesn’t just enter the black hole, but it seems to freeze just as it’s getting eaten.. Why is that? It’s because to us, time looks like it’s slowing down. But is it really? Imagine for a moment that we are the sun. To us, even as we are entering the black hole, we feel like we are moving at the same rate – c is passing us at the same rate it was before.
The same is true if you travel much faster than you were before. To you, you feel like you’re going no faster than you were, but everything is zooming by you. Imagine you are in a really, really fast moving train. What do you see? You see everything around you going really fast. It looks the same to the people watching you. But the people watching you – if you are the train and you are going really, really fast – you start to look like one big slur of a line going around the earth. But the reality becomes, by now the train is moving so much faster than the people watching it, that the people on the train, who to themselves are moving at the same rate as the people watching the train – are actually moving through time at a faster pace than the observers of that train. Could this be what we are witnessing a black hole do as it eats a sun? It could.. Here’s why:
We know there are two ways time slows down or speeds up – depending on the observer’s perspective – but nobody ever explains why and how. Imagine this – if light passes you at a constant rate, no matter how fast you are going, and we’ve seen this happen before our very eyes with a black hole gaining a lot of mass, it’s just like moving faster – the more gravity something gains, the faster it is going through time. So how are we observing this? It’s simply because it is the only event like it that we can observe right now. We are actually witnessing the black hole gain a lot of mass very rapidly, seeing time speed up for it compared to us, and the speed of light speed up for it at the exact same rate…
Here’s an easy way to describe to you what is going on here. You see, light acts just like time. When you speed up, you don’t think you are going any faster, but time actually speeds up for you and so does the speed of light. What’s interesting to note now is, since we’ve observed this in a black hole as it quickly gains a lot of energy, is that these simple equasions are meant for the exact observer. For example, it is from the perspective of the sun entering the black hole, or us watching it. It’s a perception thing – and this is how it all ties back to relativity – c^2 is actually relative to the observer, so to multiple observers, c^2 actually isn’t a constant – and since you should now be able to figure out how to calculate exactly how fast something is moving through time, you can now see that c is responsible for that time phenomina, and they are synonymous.
So here we go: Imagine again that time is like a video – with an x,y,z axis being your three-dimensional space, and another axis being time. If you can picture it, the images in one frame is a point in time of space. If you advance one frame, you are advancing through time. But you can only go forward, or fast forward – you can’t actually rewind. So what happens as we see a black hole gobble up a star, and how do we see it freeze? It’s just like we are going frame to frame, at say 20 frames per second. But we see that the star just added a ton of energy to the black hole and we are witnessing it from our perspective. It’s just like the black hole rapidly added 200 more frames per second to us – but we have to watch those 200 frames at the pace we are going – at 20 frames per second – that’s why we see it like it’s slowing down. We’re still going at 20 frames per second, but now the black hole just moved to 200 frames per second – really fast. In other words, we are watching it speed up time on itself before our very eyes, and it’s the only thing we can witness do this.
Think of it like this – if we are making a youtube video, and we have 20 frames for each second – what happens when we move out to 200 frames? That’s 10 seconds of video. That’s just like what we are seeing with a black hole gobbling up a star. Only we have to watch those 200 frames in our time – 20 frames for each second. So we are seeing 10 seconds of slow-motion video. But the black hole is seeing those 200 frames in 1 second. So to it, it feels like it is still going the same speed, but it has actually sped up the more mass it has gained. Because it is suddenly moving much faster than us through time (it just gained a lot of mass/energy really fast), to it, it is now moving at a rate of 200 frames per second. To the black hole itself, it feels as if it is still moving at 20 frames per second. So to the black hole, it doesn’t appear that time has sped up at all – it thinks it is still going at the same pace it was. But to the other observer, we can easily see that it is going forward through time now.
Not so hard, right? So what we have to do is this: we have to realize that c^2 actually is variable according to different observers. These forms of Einstein’s equasion is from the exact viewpoint of the original observer. So in other words, we should now be able to not only calculate the mass of something given its energy, or the energy of something according to its mass, but now be able to realize that speed and gravity plays a factor – these equasions only hold if you are that object. If you are not that object, c^2 actually is not a constant. This is why relativity came up.
In other words, as you move faster – what are you doing? You are advancing through time faster than everything else. What happens to the speed of light as you move faster? It goes by you – but only at a constant rate if you’re not massive (in a vacuum). This shows that the speed of light follows time, and tells you that the two are synonymous, and now not only can you calculate how much faster you are going through time as you move, but also as you stay near, enter, and leave very massive collections of energy – like going from the surface of our planet to the surface of a bigger planet. On the bigger planet, you would be going through time at a faster rate – and adding these equasions to things like relativity, then recalculating these based on the change in c, should be able to give you more exact measurements.
Now you can also test this (we basically already have with satellites – just not quite). You can measure the speed of light in the best vacuum (least gravity and movement) that you can arrive at. That should give you the best possible measure of the speed of light, and therefore time. Here’s why physicists fail to understand this – because they are not taking gravity (most physicists – there actually are people working on this age-old theory) and applying the variations of the speed of light to it. The reason goes back to Einstein’s equasions, as I displayed above. They just haven’t solved it because they are not realizing it is the same as measuring speed in relativity. The difference here is, they need to measure mass or energy instead of speed. Then when that is done, they can figure out the exact differences in c, and therefore the exact differences in time. This is all new stuff for you – even for you physicists. You didn’t need to show me your math – you just needed to give me a good enough description of what was going on, along with some further observations I made by keeping up on news, information, blogs, etc. There’s hidden ‘gems’ out there on the internet just waiting for the pickings…
Even Ken Ono, with his 2011 paper on number theory (I just used that as a valid enough excuse to tell you all of this), finally stated that it was other mathematicians, even undergrads, that they opened up his funded study to, which generated enough ideas, for them to come up with the theory. In reality – it wasn’t actually their ideas. They just did the math. Then they assumed all the credit, and went ‘oh yeah – we opened this up to all number theory mathematicians to generate ideas’… Keep in mind, ideas are just like anything else – you may think they are wrong, or you may think there’s something more to them. Without a trained eye, you may not tell. Even with the trained eye, you may not tell. It’s only after you’ve disproven absolutely or proven absolutely the idea that you find your answers…
You see, relativity – especially with gravity – is very difficult for us to test. Why? Because we are always testing it from our own observation. It’s just like with gravity, we are only calculating it from the perspective as if it were us. What I mean is this – if we go out in space, and measure it’s speed, it travels at a certain speed per second. If we go back to earth, and test again, we should get a slower speed, but that is only because light is now traveling through particles and matter – meaning it takes longer to travel through transparent items all over earth – but actually, if we know what was really going on, we would get, without air and everything in the atmosphere, the exact same measurement. Then if we really knew what was going on, if earth was a big mass with no atmosphere, is we might get a slightly faster measurement. That would be very interesting.. But there are other ways, that we already have available..
How is that possible, if gravity actually does have an impact on time and therefore the speed of light? Because we are doing this test as though we are the observer. To us, the observation is no different if we are on earth than it is if we were in space. It’s just like I said with the sun entering the black hole – to the sun, when it was in outer space it felt like it was moving at 20 frames per second, and when it entered the black hole it still felt like it was still moving at 20 frames per second. If we were on a super-fast moving train, to us, when we first started and were still, we felt like we were moving at 20 frames per second. As we sped up, we still feel like we’re moving at 20 frames per second, even though if we were to see our surroundings, we would know we are moving really, really fast. So if we were to think about this – is c really a constant, to different observers? No, it isn’t…
Because c works this way with motion, and time speeds up for things moving faster, the same is true of gravity – time speeds up the more gravity you have as well.
So here I have given you two big research projects: using this, you should not only be able to calculate the mass of a black hole, but you should be able to calculate the speed of light change when you know both the energy and mass change of a black hole (given that you can apply what you already know to relativity), and calculate just how much faster it is moving through time compared to the rest of us floating around it. Not only that, but you can now predict, given an energy and a mass, how fast you are progressing through time. All you need to do is know the speed of light in a vacuum, calculate the mass of a planet, sun, or black hole (or its total energy), and then re-calculate c^2 from the planet’s mass and energy and note the difference, only you will need a new equasion to know the difference of c^2 between observers… Interesting yet?
Here’s how this can be done. If you can tell how fast light passes by a moving object – it’s a constant rate. Let’s imagine this for a moment – it’s much easier to visualize with speed. If you move at 10mph, light passes you, let’s say, at 20 mph. If you are moving at 20 mph, light passes you, at say 40 mph. What’s the difference in the speed of light between the two? We now can see the difference is exactly 20 mph. Now that we know the speed of light can tell us exactly how fast we are moving through time – imagine that this gets compounded. What happens with gravity? The same thing. We just haven’t found out exactly how to do this yet (or maybe we have, and I’m just repeating what physicists already know – I don’t know everything about physics yet). If time goes faster for both speed and gravity, we have two problems. One is how fast we are moving. The other is how massive of an object we are either a part of or are near. It depends on how far away you are from that massive object.
So now re-apply what we know for time, the speed of light, and motion – and apply that to gravity. It should work in exactly the same way. All that needs to be done is to observe a black hole. When a sun enters a black hole – do we know when that event happened? Yes. We know how much time it took for the sun to become a frozen circle of a smudge of light. That is our base of c from our perspective. Can we measure its total energy based on how large the black hole grew? Yes. We know that the total energy it has consumed is based on the growth of the outer rim of the black hole. So all that’s left is to keep watching and find out when that light starts to dis-appear, and apply that to how much time it took us to watch the black hole gain energy. In other words, if we can know how much energy the black hole has consumed, and then how long it took to consume it from our perspective, we know the mass and energy. Then to find the difference in c, we only need to compute the difference in time from the sun going to a smudge of light, and that smudge of light to disappear. Now we can arrive at an equasion that can tell us the exact difference in c as it relates to various gravity…
But there’s another way this can be tested. What have we done with E = mc^2? We have created a bomb – multiple different variations of similar bombs. What can we do if gravity plays an effect on the speed of light – and therefore time? If we took one bomb, blew it up on earth – then took the exact same bomb, and blew it up on a much bigger or smaller planet – we could measure the difference in its explosiveness. This takes c out of the equasion – and instead we can measure only E. If there is a difference in E, when we know that the mass of our bomb is the same in both places, this can only indicate not only that c has changed, but exactly how much – just by observing the difference in E, if we can assume that m is constant. But there is more to this story, which I will explain later below..
Even though its a small part of matter that we are measuring as ‘m’, we have to remember that if gravity plays an effect on time, and therefore c, this would hold that its explosiveness would change depending on how much gravity it was near. So either it would blow up bigger in space, or on another planet, or smaller. (I may actually have this backwards – I’m not sure.) And if you can measure it, that can also tell you the exact difference in the speed of light given different gravity sources. Keep in mind, in a vacuum, ‘m’ is not affected by much, so we would expect c^2 to be smaller, since it is not in gravity much, and therefore the energy release would be smaller. What should this also say? Energy actually increases the more gravity it is under (or at least it should – with the same mass). So we have a very compounded problem to work on here – and this is why calculations are not quite exact – because we not only have to realize that these measurements are from the perspective of the single observer, but now we have to take speed, gravity, changes in c and therefore changes in energy into account…
In other words, how do we measure the difference in c and therefore time? We have to stop pretending that c is the constant, and start pretending that m is the constant. In other words, now Einstein’s equasion looks like this: let’s say m = 3. What happens if E is 30? remember – c^2 = E/m. 30/3 = 10 = c^2. Keeping m the same – 3 – what happens as E becomes 60? 60/3 = 20 = c^2. c^2 has changed from being a constant, to having a difference of 10..
See how I found this 6 years ago now? Just plugging in numbers, and seeing what it does. The reality is, both ways are actually correct. But you have to follow the rules of the math – you can’t basically just go plugging in any numbers. But it’s still all correct… This should at least be enough to get you started on how to take relativity, and instead of speed, apply that to gravity. Or instead of gravity, apply that to mass. Or instead of mass, apply that to energy. Etc., etc.
But this explains some things: I still don’t quite know how this works, and I don’t know how to make it into a correct equasion – this is only revealing, not precise. You need new math equasions for this stuff – it’s not exact to do it this way.
For example: do we know the mass of a single object doesn’t change? What is mass? Mass is the measure of something like weight, but there is a difference. When a man goes to the moon, his weight changes. They try to walk, but can’t help bouncing, hopping, and leaping from step to step. The feel so light, because there is so little gravity. But did our calculation of mass change? No. That should lead us to the conclusion that if our current calculations of mass do not change given gravity, then we certainly could observe E change, calculate c, and be able to figure out the difference.
What’s also interesting is that perhaps we won’t notice a difference in energy release. But we can also do something else: remember that our measurements of the speed of light on earth is actually slower than in a vacuum (keep in mind earth has a bunch of energy clusters light must move through instead of around, because it’s actually full of matter even in air and out atmosphere. In space, it only has to move over energy waves). So what could happen? We may see a bigger explosion on earth, and a smaller explosion in space. But this would only lead us to error. It would be like observing the black hole eat up a sun, and saying ‘it’s slowing down’, when actually, it’s speeding up.
So you have several things to consider. But really, all that you may need to do to know exactly what is going on is to video-tape it. Let’s say you video-tape a nuclear bomb on earth at a high-speed camera, meaning a more precise measurement of time that we can observe. Video tape the same bomb going off in space from earth. Note the difference in time that the rate of the spread of the explosion occurs. Note the difference in time that each bomb detonates, spreads, and stops. Note the difference in energy. Now go back, think of what is going on, take all the different variables into account, and make sure you are correct.
Or you could devise a similar way to measure this with a black hole eating a sun. We’ve already video-taped the first part, now we just need to keep an eye on the rest. This would lead you to know the difference in the change in c. Then you would know the difference in E. You can already determine the mass, and you know your calculations of mass are approximately accurate, and it doesn’t actually change. But E and c does change. So there’s multiple ways you could do this to find out the effect gravity has on time, and the speed of light. If you know how to calculate an approximate mass of a sun given your observations of it, you may already be able to calculate its current total energy – before it enters the black hole. Then, when that smudge of light ends, you could simply calculate the change in total energy if you can observe the energy change in the black hole, and solve for c. Or, you could observe the same thing and just notice the difference in time, which could also tell you c.
These sorts of tests would lead you to a further understanding of these things – and that is how you go from idea, theory, opinion, to fact, statistic, equasion, etc.
So now what do we do if we wanted to venture out in space in the best way possible? What happens if we want to get there really fast, like we’re expecting – is that really the best way? No. Because the faster you move, the faster light moves past you, and so the faster you are moving through time (not to mention you would be blasting through a lot of debris). But the result is, if you are moving faster than the earth’s movement rate through space plus its gravity – and know exactly how fast earth is moving through time, then you would know that you are actually adding a problem to yourself – by moving faster than the earth, you are arriving at your destination much further in time than if you were to move there the exact same rate of time as earth. So to earth, the faster you move, the reality is, to the people still on earth, the later you get there. If you move slower than the earth is moving through space-time, the result would be similar. So the best way to explore space is to have your space-craft be a fully sustainable environment, and move at the exact same pace in time as earth – that way you maximize how soon you get there from the perspective of those of us still on earth. Then you could send your light signals back to earth to report what happened, and what you find there.
What else can I now tell you about his very simple equasion? Look now at c^2 = E/m. What little secret does this hold? I assumed that at first it must mean every ratio of energy and mass that assumes an element. But that was not correct, seemingly. But what else it does mean is a foundation of chemistry…
What forms our planets? Can we peek into the deepest innards of any planet, moon, or sun and see if there exists a super-massive element there? No. We just assume that its the grouping of elements that make up a combined mass, and gives planets properties such as magnetic fields, radiation, etc. I now believe that not only is the former wrong, but impossible. First, the periodic table must stop somewhere, even though we seem to always be finding something more massive. In reality, each element by itself in isolation, without forming any compound, is rather tiny. So compounds must be what allow matter to create more and more mass – enough to create gravity.
Without energy, there is no mass, without mass, there is not gravity. Therefore, it requires a mass and energy clustered together to create any gravity. So in turn, it is impossible that gravity alone created the universe. While it is possible that astronomically enormous amounts of gravity created this reality and this universe, it is not possible for gravity to exist without a mass, or without clusters of energy, therefore you have a paradox with the idea that the universe started at nothing, and somehow gravity – that could not exist without a ton of energy together, meaning this is impossible – existed with nothing and created everything. Instead, the previous reality created everything.
Here I will show you how. But it’s not actually a paradox – only if you think in terms of time being a single line, with a beginning and and end. Just like Jesus said ‘the beginning is the end, everything proceeds from me and receeds to me’. (I’ll get to the profoundness of his statements during his time and age later, but also his contradictions and what he left out in another post – it’s also important for you to understand) The universe is the same way – it goes in an infinite loop, where the beginning of one reality is the end of the former reality.
Therefore, if you know that space is finite according to its total energy in the universe, including energy waves and expanding on energy waves, you’ll realize that the big rip actually is just like a balloon popping – it’s a perfect example. What happens after you pop a balloon? It deflates really small, clustering what was stretched back together. Then if you could imagine you could simply blow it back up like bubble-gum, you see it. It results in the next big bang, where particles are colliding and there is super-massive energy all bundled together, enormous amounts of gravity and speed, creating higg’s boson after higg’s boson as rapidly moving particles collide and explode. It’s an immensely powerful event, and would be one I wish I could see with my own eyes, but never will. I’ll get to why that’s important later, but for now just realize that we are well, well beyond the beginning of time in regards to what is really the universe, if there ever was an actual beginning….
I have given you another research project here that you could do, just like so many other ideas I am now giving freely to you that you could design tests and conclusions for. Here, you could use a computer and the equasion of time, like the original researchers, to calculate backwards past 0. We already know it enters a new time. Why stop calculating? Keep going either backwards and forwards, and see if it stops at the same number and begins with zero, or stops at different numbers – like its always growing, shrinking, or whatever. See, if it grows, it may shrink going backwards. That alone could teach you about the beginning of time, and tell you if there was one, even with time being an infinite loop forwards. If it is the case that it shrinks to 0 eventually and goes no further in the loops of different universes, then that would tell you time is just like space – 3 dimensions. It not only forms a loop, but has a center – an absolute zero. If it doesn’t, you now know time forms only 2 dimensions, never growing or shrinking backwards or forwards. But with this original research, it is now easy to see that time does not actually add only one dimension to space – but actually two or three dimensions. It would be an interesting article to read about…
So what secret can I now safely tell you about chemistry that I’ve known for a very long time, I was just afraid of the idea that perhaps the periodic table does not end, just like this form of Einstein’s equasion? What are the two most abundant elements in the universe? Hydrogen and Helium. Why? First, they are the simplest elements to form, meaning it takes the least amount of energy to form. What’s next might surprise you – it also takes almost no compression to form. Keep in mind – the reason I’ve held out for so long in showing you that you can re-arrange even a simple physics formula like this and it gives you new insights and new meanings, just showing you one way someone else may have arrived at the same conclusion I did. The following is why I’ve waited so long to let it out…
You have to realize – Einstein, I believe, already knew this in his time. But you have to understand the reason for his statements: ‘I should have been a watch-maker’. ‘I do not know with what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones’. Why was he and his assistant arguing over the idea that a black hole cannot be created or could be created, but nobody ever knew why? What if I were to tell you his equasions predict not only atom and nuclear bombs, but the creation of black holes? What if I were to further say that telling you this, it is arguable that actually the periodic table doesn’t stop, and super-massive elements are actually possible? What if I told you it may be possible when compressing elements to create a chain reaction that you can’t stop? He was already depressed a lot that he taught people a weapon that used world-wide could destroy life on earth, and everyone thought that was his biggest achievement – never taking responsibility for their actions or knowing what not to create or make – but what if he turned right around and gave someone the ability to hold the world hostage by creating a black hole on demand? It would make his nuclear war dilemma seem like child’s play, and would further destroy all life that would ever be possible in our solar system, not just for a short time in the earth’s evolutionary history. As a precaution – I think they never told you. That’s why they never told you what they had found, the theory on chemistry and elements and its relation to gravity.
But here’s why I feel it is time to explain this detail: because even if people do use this knowledge to create more plutonium, or more uranium – does that really matter now? We already have enough bombs to completely blanket the earth in nuclear explosion and waste – completely destroying all advanced life (and remember – advanced lifeforms with the ability to read, write, as advanced as we do is actually a rare thing – most life in the universe probably hasn’t had the opportunity, given limited capacity, high gravity levels, different materials and liquids, distance from heat sources, and the protections against solar radiation and asteroids – all of this perfect balance has allowed earth to evolve wonderfully, just as we may think Mars once did, for a very, very long time – even with one big asteroid, one massive, almost complete extinction event leaving no fossil records, etc – it all hangs in a really nice balance in our solar system. It’s that rare. Most life in the universe probably hasn’t had the chance to evolve much past single-celled organisms or basic forms of life, even though I believe life can and does exist everywhere it is possible to, and inhabiting another planet and thinking that is a good model for the future is really, really stupid. So is populating a dead planet in our solar system. We are much better off learning how to sustain and protect life on our own planet – rather than ruining it by our own foolishness and selfishness.
So why do I not care if you know how to create more bombs out of different elements? Because it no longer matters. We’ve got enough bombs to wipe out all life on earth already – if one nation were to launch, every other nation would practically blanket every other nation in a huge waste of nuclear radiation, explosion, and EMT pulses. One launch today is already enough to wipe us out – it’s that simple. That’s why Einstein was so depressed about it, always talking about what a failure it was, and why he should have never said it. But that no longer matters, what’s done is done. I am finishing his efforts here. Since it is already the case that enough enriched plutonium and uranium is out there to wipe out life on earth for a short time, it doesn’t matter if you create more. Who cares? Global warming is a bigger, more imminent threat anyway, ending in the same result or worse, and we’re not doing a thing about it except not accepting it, denying it, and continuing to destroy ourselves and not caring. So I may as well tell you the following:
I am now about 99.9% sure it is impossible for you to create a black hole, and the periodic table does stop somewhere. It’s because chemical compounds create gravity by combined mass together – not single elements, as we currently understand. Also, we know that even clusters of rock like the pyramids slows down time a little and creates gravity. Therefore, it must be the case that the combination of multiple elements is what creates gravity, and since that is the case, man could not create a black hole even with the biggest machine and all the material in our solar system. You have to remember, our solar system is actually a small one, our sun tiny in comparison to other suns. It will result in a red dwarf, barely consuming the earth in about 30 billion years, to be precise. In fact, we could stay on our earth and our solar system for the whole duration of that 30 bln years, if we really wanted to – before we were forced to move far away from our sun. You see, when you are smart, you understand the importance and rarity of life. You start to respect it. We must preserve it – not find ways to kill it off or kill ourselves off.
Why is that important? Because chemical compounds create combined mass, and combined mass/energy creates gravity, and gravity alone is responsible for creating denser and denser elements; this means it is impossible for you to create a black hole with even a million years, the biggest machine, and most of the matter in our solar system. So I can now also tell you how elements form – they form much like chemical bonds. Only it takes millions of years of gravity (natural compression) to create it. That’s why Hydrogen and Helium are so abundant. That’s why denser elements are so rare. But it’s easier for nature to seemingly create chemical compounds after it has created an element, so here you have the spread of elements that make up the earth. Life forms and evolves in similar ways – see the pattern?
(Is it now seemingly strange that dinosaurs were so big? Why would they be so big if there was the same amount of gravity today? Why would they require denser and more abundant oxygen? The answer may be – the earth used to be bigger… Also, consider something strange about an old religious text – they said the earliest man used to live for 1,000 years. If time is relative, and we are slowly progressing through time at different rates, can we really say that given enough time into the past, like 4 million years – that a person living that long is impossible – just because the maximum age today is at most about 120 years? Some things to consider – we shouldn’t pretend to know everything)
So I can flat out tell you – if you throw the exact right amount of elements together, you should be able to compress them (given enough time, or smash them) into an element further down (containing more protons and electrons) on the periodic table – it’s just you have to avoid making a chemical bond out of the elements somehow, and you may need a lot of compression, a lot of energy, and a lot of time. But if nature can do it – simply with compression, I don’t see how it isn’t possible.
Do I know exactly how to do this? No. Does anyone? That’s what I’m trying to tell you how to research it. It either requires gravity, or rapid movement, or both. They are both synonyms, anyway. So either we can smash elements together, or we can crush them together. Once we figure out the exact details, we will understand how to do it. But before we do it, we should fully understand it and what it does. This means even more math and observations – without testing it blindly first. (CERN originally wanted to test for a better energy source, but they were lucky they didn’t blow everything up. It was at least a good guess, but weren’t they still wrong once they did the test? Something unexpected happened. Then they were wrong again about particles moving faster than the speed of light. Whoo-hoo. Can someone find better uses for that gigantic project other than trying to create a higg’s boson every 1,000,000 tries?)
Exactly like we can compress coal into a diamond, you now only need to think really tiny – trying to form not a different compound but different elements. I just gave you the ‘golden nugget’, that idea long ago that you could make gold out of something else – like rock. How do you think gold formed? Well, how do you think Hydrogen forms? By quarks combining and creating bonds, to electrons and protons creating bonds – just like chemistry.
Then it just takes millions of years of more bonds and collisions and gravity to create denser elements, different elements, and here you have all the various elements we find here on earth. But have we found new elements in bigger planets? No. The sun? No. It must mean that it requires the combination of elements forming chemical compounds, and chemical compounds must be easier to form than other elements, and therefore its compounds instead of different elements, that is responsible for most gravity.
Therefore, it’s safe to tell you this – you cannot create a black hole. But you can drastically speed up the time of creating a new element out of an old one. Just realize that there are limited elements in our solar system, and there may be consequences to doing things like mining Mars. Be responsible with this – don’t just create gold. Make stuff that’s rare and has a use that we could really need in the future – for better energy, or energy preservation, or sustainable resources, or just like the idea of reducing CO2 by creating nanotubes out of it – it would lead to the cheap materials required for new industry, and at the same time solve our global warming problems, without relying on every nation to simply ‘stop polluting’, when everyone is still slaves to money and those in control of it don’t give a crap about life or a sustainable planet…
Not too hard to wrap your head around yet, I hope? But am I making sense to you, at least if you’re looking up the background information and realizing the conclusions that I have drawn from numerous observations over time? Interesting stuff that was looking right at you in the face – yes?
What else does c^2 = E/m mean? It should mean the following: c^2 relies on an observer – for anything to exist, it must be observed by either energy or matter. It’s certainly an interesting current theory and at least close, but not quite exact, that physicists have on our reality – we currently accept and think that it takes an observer, rather the conscious mind, to make things in our universe real! It’s something that really creeps out a physicist – thinking it takes an intelligent being to make things real. But I will now debunk that – and it’s because of my algebraic re-arrangement of Albert’s simple equasion..
When physics people talk about a conscious mind being required for anything to exist in our reality – keep in mind it’s not a conscious mind at all – but rather any observer…
As Einstein’s equasion predicts, anything that is energy (particularly energy waves, as we’ve discovered a vacuum is full of) is an observer of light. Since light bounces off of everything and that is even how you see with your eyes, it follows that if any form of energy can observe any other form of energy given light, then that recognition is all it takes. It doesn’t take a conscious mind, but rather realize that a conscious mind is much like a chemical compound – just a more complex form of energy. Therefore, all it takes is one energy or energy wave to observe another, and this means that any object – from dust to energy waves to a rock or proton in the farthest reaches of space – is observed by a ton of other energy, and it observes a ton of other energy. That’s why it’s real – not because we recognized it, but because energy did. You should now start seeing the tie-in to a higg’s boson creating mass…
If you keep in mind that energy is everywhere in the universe, cannot be destroyed – only repurposed or reconfigured, and even every form of chemical compound can be broken down to simple clusters of energy – you should easily see that one energy is all anything is – a complete illusion creating bigger and bigger versions of that illusion. ‘Seeing’ another piece of energy is all it takes – NOT a conscious mind – everything is observed endless times by other energy. Even light has bounced off of every compound in the darkest places of the earth countless times – before it ever even formed that part of the earth (Remember – every planet starts off as a collection of dust or smaller elements, until they start forming compounds and attaining more and more collective mass) – otherwise, why did the universe exist before dinosaurs, and why did it continue to exist even during a part in time of the earth’s almost complete fossil record absence?
That could also be the reason why light passes everything at a constant rate. If you realize that even a vacuum is full of energy waves (2 competing ones that cancel each-other out to be more precise), and light itself is like an energy wave, you might see that it could be the case that light ‘travels’ on energy waves, or maybe even energy itself. Perhaps light is synonymous with one of those waves, or there’s a tie-in somehow. Who knows? But it must be the case that it travels over space-time, just like an energy wave, and since it passes everything at a constant rate, it must mean that light in particular is recognized by energy, is perhaps the reason why energy recognizes other energy as an ‘observer’, and it may even get passed on, jumping energy as it travels – meaning it is not light passing you, but rather you passing it on…
As it travels, it would then make sense that it would pass you by at the same rate, no matter how fast you as an object or particle are moving, because you didn’t realize that you as an object are made up of energy, and it’s as if light just hops over that energy.. Well, maybe that’s a little difficult for you to imagine. I guess it would be easier to suggest if you are a line of energy waves, it’s like you have eyes on both the front and back of your heads, and you instantly pass on what you see to the next observer in line. That’s why it passes everything at a constant rate, or at least that’s my theory of it. So here we have two questions that with a little more study and information, can finally be put to rest.
Why do you think both light and possibly pi are at the center of all this stuff? Once you find out not only how, but why – you’ll have answered most of the questions about reality. The truth is, we have most of the puzzle pieces already – we just need to piece them all together and find out what is missing. But we’re about to see some really big pieces all in one go…
When you reach for the stars, the first thing you must realize is that it has already traveled to your fingertips… That was an old saying of mine. Interesting now that I can tell you these things…
What Ono said was that they realized this theory not only from ideas of other mathematicians but as they walked to a certain waterfall, noting the patterns in the nature around them. They said they didn’t have to travel to the stars, because they have basically already seen them by a walk to the waterfalls. That is the both the significance and the gravity of this find – in fact, it tied together everything I ever questioned about physics…
So now we have two special numbers in math. One is a constant – ‘c^2′, the other, a seemingly completely random fraction or even perhaps the longest pattern – ‘pi’. Why? Could it be that these particular numbers are the way they are because they simply are at the heart of all of this fractal behavior (everything being a part of something bigger, and forming patterns)??? That’s what is next to find out. You see, while this allows me to explain to you so many things that may have never occurred to you, it leads to even further questions. But at least it’s like we have a giant jigsaw puzzle, and you allowed me to put a lot of the pieces together for you in one cluster…
When researchers were calculating time, they used their equasions to calculate backwards, and found that when they went backwards past 0, they entered into an entirely new time. But why? And how? Those two questions were never answered. But you have to remember the fabric of the universe is space-time. According to the ‘big rip’ theory, space is not infinite – it reaches a point, like a balloon, where it arrives at critical space and tears space-time apart – just like a balloon popping. So why did Einstein spend his last years tirelessly trying to prove that the universe is infinite? Because it is! This paper by Ono&co proves Einstein was right – the universe is infinite, this is one of many universes, and it is an illusion – bound by simple rules that math can describe.
The fact is, if space is finite in one time, but time repeats itself, this means the following: We know the universe had a big bang at the beginning, creating great conditions for a higg’s boson, right? We know that it takes rapidly moving, explosive particles to create a higg’s boson (see CERN), right? We know now that both the earth and the universe seem to have and end-date of about 30-trillion years, right? We know that at some point the universe tears itself apart, right? So if there is no beginning and no end, according to time, what do we have? You exactly have the two forming and endless loop. You see, at the beginning of each time frame, we have a big bang. Does it now make sense that like a balloon it pops eventually as it stretches out as far as possible? What happens after that? It must somehow collect and repeat – or else time would simply end in the future, or stop at zero – which it doesn’t. This means the two events happen in a loop, and the time in-between is each universe – each reality.
The reason is in the math – you see, according to the ‘big rip’, where we can see there is definitely an ‘end’ to our own universe – if it really was an end, why does it calculate into a new time? Also, why does the beginning calculate into a new time? Aha! Another conclusion that we can draw. You see, Einstein was indeed right – but he should have noticed this in his time – because time itself is infinite, the universe is too! You see, if space-time makes four dimensions like we currently think, then that would mean space is x,y,z, and time is like watching a film or creating a video clip. You have a timeline on a new ‘x’ axis that goes in a straight line.
But time itself forms an infinite loop – it’s like it reaches the end and instantly rewinds, replaying an entirely new film! I hope this part is easy for you to picture. Then time itself creates actually two dimensions – it forms a circle or an object on an x,y plane, not just a single, straight line which would be the case with an x plane. Now imagine that anything multi-dimensional can be described in one dimension. Gets kind of weird to think about, but easy if you can visualize it. An easy way to visualize five dimensions is like looking at the model of a single electron and proton – what does it look like if a kid does it? Like a wobbly orb surrounded by a circular or ovular smudge of a line.
In other words, we should now know that space has three dimensions, and time (as I currently understand it) does not add just a fourth – it is actually two-dimensional – where one dimension (like a play-head in a video on your computer – the ‘time’ part) is like a point on a circle, and the other dimension is the circle (pretend that the circle is a single line, with a start and a stop, only the video is instantly rewinding to the beginning or moving on to the next movie kind of like YouTube). Therefore, we have in total, a 5 dimensional space-time.
We can see that putting these to pieces of theory together, it should validate at least one of two competing theories on the universe (1. the universe constantly expands and contracts [validated], 2. The universe has a beginning and end and is part of a multiverse [invalidated], or 3. There exists our universe which expands and contracts in an infinite loop and somehow it forms a multiverse [next question - could both be true?])
What if pi and c are part of that fabric? What if they define the very confines and reasons why our current universe is the way it is, and works the way it does? What if those two numbers are actually at the heart of all of these patterns, coincidences, and fractal behavior?
I think now you see the rather large implications of what Ono&company just did. The implications are huge. Not just for computer scientists like me, but for so many disciplines – including particle physics and astral physics. When you realize that any positive integer is a part of a larger fractal integer, you start to see the pattern in everything – chemistry, planets, solar systems, galaxies, sun birth and decay, black hole birth and decay, etc, etc.
Everything follows similar patterns, especially what should now be a ‘law’ of infinity – everything seeming to be born or begin, grow, decay, and die – but also reborn and the fact that nothing ever truly dies – no energy can be destroyed. Now I think you can see why I bounce between being an atheist and thinking at least a God or a different reality such as a heaven is indeed possible – because science without religion is lame, but religion without science is blind. I will fully explain my reasoning for this in my next post – a lot of people are not only turning a blind eye to religion, but also to themselves and everyone else – all life. That’s a different topic, though, both of these are simply meant to describe to you things that may have never occurred to your mind, but were staring right at you….
Even your memories are endlessly embedded and stored on your own energy (spread out over parts of the brain and even the body), and even the matter that gets sucked up by a black hole is not only reshaped to its information imprinted on it, but the black hole assumes that much of a greater outer size – and still emits not only radiation but as we just found out actual chemical compounds to the far reaches of space, energy cannot be destroyed, and everything is simply energy. Interesting, yes?
Really, mathematicians have opened up so many doors to understanding the universe and solving so many problems. But it never stops. Questions can always be asked, more thought always happens. The objective here shouldn’t be to find a way to create artificial life (that would destroy life – stop working on ways to destroy ourselves), but to rather become better life-forms. (Remember – Einstein was in a lot of different fields of thought and discipline, and one thing he definitely said was ‘Peace cannot ever come about by force, but rather only through a common understanding’. In my next post, through teachings of religion, I will give you that understanding – it’s on the rest of you to realize it, see what’s right in front of you, take the steps, and at least start moving towards a better mankind and a better, sustainable world for yourselves – before it’s too late. Even Einstein vouched for socialism as a good economic model. He was right about so many things – he was smarter than almost all of us. So too was one of his kids, Eduard, for his part.
Oh – there was something newer that I wanted to tell you about the universe. We know that space-time is full of competing energy waves that cancel eachother out. But what is that? It’s likely the very fabric of space-time, which we used to think was empty. Imagine a balloon again. As you blow it up slowly, what happens? The outside of it stretches. What’s going on if energy waves are that fabric? Then it means as we progress through time, they are getting stretched. What does it mean if they pull eachother apart? That’s the big rip theory’s come-in. What does light do? It travels over space-time. So not only does time progress more slowly at first, and speeds up later, but we can know just how much it has by measuring the speed of light now in a vacuum, and say, measuring it again along the exact same coordinates 100 years later – to see if it has sped up.
You can imagine these wavelengths like a grid. How does light travel over it? It’s like it jumps from line to line. Then what happens as you put an object on it, it’s like it jumps to the object and on to the next line. Here, we can see that it travels over energy. But everything is energy, basically. So it’s basically not that light passes you by, but more like you are passing it on…
So here we can imagine not only how much time the universe has – but how fast everything will get there; correcting our calculation. Now imagine that these wavelengths are in three dimensional space, and instead of looking at gravity like a sheet, see it for what it is. It’s a lot like magnetism on everything. It pulls everything to it, stretching these energy waves as it does so, the more massive it gets. Now, we can calculate also just how much that stretch is. That’s some really interesting stuff for you here that you can all go out and test easily for yourselves, some stuff that may not have occurred to you….
Consider this – if there is a space-time, and it is something, what is it? Is it nothing? How would absolute emptiness result in tearing itself apart? (Again, you need to understand the ‘big rip’, it’s validity, and realize that it would not be the case that space could rip itself apart if space was empty). So what we have found with the observation of energy waves filling what we thought was a vacuum, is that we’ve found the fabric of space-time. It is that energy. What happens if you pull it apart? It rips. Is it a good idea to travel through space by ripping a hole in space-time? No – that would be worse than my ‘black hole’ scenario – it would cause the big rip before it’s supposed to happen – not only ending our galaxy, but the entire universe. But it’s still very impossible to ‘rip’ space time – that would require a ton of energy, more than any current black hole (which is really a ton).
So the observation of energy waves filling space can lead to numerous other observations about not only the properties of space and time, but the properties of our ‘glue’, which is the rate of time or the speed of light, the properties of gravity, the properties of speed, and therefore lead us to correct our calculations further, enhance understanding, and not only know how, but why and when. These sorts of things should be leading us to putting all of these pieces together, clarifying the whole picture.
Going back to computers – what do I mean all of this is like one big jigsaw puzzle? Because solving problems, solving information, applying knowledge to other problems, crossing domains – it’s all the same. Once you know how to do one thing, you can apply that knowledge to something else. You just need the information behind that something else to do it. If you look at computer code – is there a math symbol for an ‘if/else statement’? Yes. is there a math symbol for a loop? Yes. Is there a math symbol for moving on to another equasion? Yes. In other words, you could take a simple computer algorithm, convert it all to a big collection of math symbols, and see what it looks like in a math equasion. Essentially, when you apply that to physics, you will realize that we’re all solving one big problem with a lot of little pieces. As we add more information, the more correct and accurate we get, and the more we understand. Once you put them all together, you see the big picture. But you don’t actually need one big equasion – you just need to know the parts.
My own work is moving towards solving heavy math problems like this. Most people’s work is starting to involve at least an understanding of calculus. Understanding all the pieces and tying them all together is my brain’s speciality. Seriously – dive into heavy math and all forms of education, science, and arts; and understand it all – its immensely interesting. Rather than search the internet for funny things and spend your time arguing about nonsense, start learning. It’s not cool to be dumb, rather it’s vastly important to be intelligent, and thirst for all knowledge. Keep digging. 100 years is enough time to learn so many things, if you just use your time. I know dumb people are great at breeding, but even those people can train their minds to become more intelligent, more creative, and deeper thinkers. It just takes time, work, and training. Life isn’t just about fun – in case you haven’t noticed.
The path to learning a ton of knowledge is profound, amusing, entertaining, healthy, and a lot of fun. Working out problems is where all the fun is at. The reward comes from that light bulb going off in your mind – like we were ‘in a dark room all this time, and suddenly someone switched on the light’. That’s where all the enjoyment is. Not in making money or getting recognition – that’s just survival and chasing after selfish garbage. The reality is, knowledge is amazing. Training your mind to learn any discipline is equally amazing. We should be on an endless quest for knowledge and understanding – that should be the objective of any species that is intelligent enough to sustain itself and its environment.
So what did I just do, if you fully understand and remember what I just said above? I not only told you that a better constant is ‘m’, not ‘c’, and that energy is not a constant, either – because ‘c’ isn’t – it’s relative. How do I mean this? Imagine again – you are moving very, very fast compared to people on earth. What are you doing in comparison? Moving forward through time. If you think it’s the case that it is light passing you at the same rate – consider what is really happening. Light is synonymous with time. Is time passing you by, or are you traveling past it? The answer is the latter. So is it light passing you by? A good question to ask yourselves. Another question to ask yourselves – if ‘m’ is no different measure given gravity changes, or how fast it is going, is it a better constant than something that can change, like ‘c’? Yes. But is that even a constant, when you consider that ‘m’ is only possible because energy formed a cluster? Now you can understand Einstein – ‘reality is an illusion. Albeit a very persistent one’. Is there now any further question why he said that? Now consider I assumed light was a wave without knowing what it was, and was correct. Now imagine I told you how space-time is – what the fabric is. If everything travels through it, what is it doing? What does light do? As you get closer to it, it is more dense? Why? Because as it travels outward in every possible angle, it disperses, spreads out, and becomes less dense, and therefore more disperse and dimmer. Here, we can see that exactly, everything is traveling through and over the fabric of space time.
What else? I told you the best way to explore space. Why am I not afraid to tell you all this stuff – even though if you just prove what I’m saying, you’ve totally revised your entire understanding of science and physics, flipped it on your heads, and I already know I am right, because all of you were only thinking that ‘c’ was actually a constant, and not taking the rest of your information into account? Because you’ve already tried a ton of times to rip a hole in space-time to travel from point A to point B in the fastest way possible. Since you didn’t understand space-time, and didn’t understand gravity, motion, relativity, and light and mass and energy – you would have ended the entire universe if you were to succeed. That’s much worse than doing or testing anything I just told you, if you see how profound this is, and so yes – it was time to say it.
What else? I taught you so many observations and conclusions that you should have made. I gave you so much information that anyone should be able to understand it – and tried to make it as simple to not only understand, but visualize and know ways to test it. Does this mean scientists are wrong? No. It’s just like spatial intelligence – they have been trained over and over to see it only one way…
It’s just like the original equasion when I was treating c as a constant – what happened? It proved it was a constant. So if a physicist were looking at this, and thought it was ridiculous, they could simply show you their current math and say ‘see, c is a constant’. But if you realize relativity, and realize that ‘c’ and ‘E’ changes according to speed and gravity, you would start to realize that the actual constant is ‘m’ (mass). Mass doesn’t change with speed or gravity. Time does. The speed of light does. Energy does. But m doesn’t…
Then if they were to go back and take a hard look at everything they did from that angle, they would start to realize some very interesting, but important, details. Then they make the final realization – is ‘m’ a constant, either? Then you see a very large part of the puzzle has been solved – so many pieces come together for you. It’s just that you were missing a little detail in ‘relativity’… It’s a perception – and while all this time, you were, as physicists, not exactly right – that also doesn’t mean you were wrong. You were just doing it from one angle only. Once you look at all the various angles, and take all the different variables into account, then yes – you’ll see I’m exactly right in my ‘conclusions’, you further can prove it, and you will have advanced science greatly.
But what I am about to show you is deeper than just science. I’m going to show you how to bring and make peace. I’m using physics vs religion to show an important detail: Neither is exactly wrong, neither is exactly right – about their own studies. Further, once both sides understand the other, you’ll realize the importance of both. This should bring about a mutual respect – because both were basically handed down to us by our fathers, only religion is more ancient. After this, you should see the importance of both – and if you can catch the meanings behind what I am saying here – you’ll realize it isn’t shallow – it’s deep. You’ll realize it isn’t insane – it’s actually correct. You’ll realize that neither of you understood the other – and that is why you got caught up in a fist-fight. You both looked at the other side, and said ‘you must be wrong – you don’t make sense.’ I’ll show you that you should say ‘I see your points. We have work to do here. We can learn from one-another’….
[Edit - final] Now, what I was trying to show you was how to solve problems, how to formulate ideas, and how to create things. What did I show you if you were reading this as I was making my 10+ edits? First I had m = c^2/E. I already drew conclusions based on other observations, but it didn’t work with that. Then I remembered, c is relative to the observer. Then I explained more. Then I realized my mistake – it’s actually m = E/c^2. Then I was able to tell you how to calculate the mass of something given its energy. But that isn’t exact – because c should change as energy gets bigger, just like c changes the faster something is moving. Then I explained: they are the same. If you apply relativity to mass or energy, you will realize that you can basically just swap out movement (speed) and gravity (mass or energy) in relativity equasions, correct it, and arrive at your answer. (I haven’t done that kind of math yet – I never actually took the time to learn everything about calculus, etc) I then gave you ways you could test all of this. But did my message change? No. I already knew what was going on. Here, at first I made an intentional mistake in math to show you that we do make mistakes. People would have said I was wrong. Then I corrected it, some people may have been able to correct the rest and show you I was getting closer (which I was). Then, as I went through more and more information, explanation, and ideas – I got more correct. Until finally, you all should be able to understand the conclusions I have reached – why I have reached them, and now how I have reached them. As such, you not only now see how to solve problems, but how to be creative, how to invent things, and how to solve puzzles. You can’t throw something away at the start just because doing it one way doesn’t work at first. Try again. Even if you are wrong 200 times, it usually just means you are missing pieces to the puzzle. Once you put more pieces together, and more information, and learn more, you become more correct. Then you find your answers, and come up with what you wanted to do…
Edit [December 4 - I wanted to tell you about religion. You see, peace can never come about by force, it must come about by a common understanding. To force peace is to make people fear things - we've only learned how to control people by fear. But fear leads to other negative thinking, and through this kind of measure you can never fully control a person. What else could be done? People could wise up, and everyone could be taught not only why to be peaceful, but how. Here, we have to remember that in our world we can never achieve full peace, but we can at least get close. Indeed, the world is what you make of it. I'll turn to religion now to try and explain this to you - there are numerous other sites you could go to that can tell you similar things. It just takes an understanding, then spreading the word around, then the loss of fear, hate, anger, etc. negative emotion and feeling and the introduction of love, caring, compassion, sharing, equality, etc. sorts of ideas and emotions. Once you can teach a person why this is important, and they understand you - when you've completed this work that I'll just introduce to you here, you'll have a pretty good world....]
Here I’m going to step into religion for a while – I’ve decided to do it all in one post, only explaining only a small part of religion and Jesus and what he said. You see, it really was amazing, if you can follow the meaning, what he said during his time. It’s unreal what he said, in reality.
We have two things in our reality – opposing forces. It’s the same as telling the truth and telling a lie. Or being wrong or right. Sometimes you are partly right, or on the track to being right, so there exists in our reality a balance between the two. You are never completely wrong, and you are never actually completely right about everything all the time. So it kind of balances out, but you can move towards the edges. I’ll explain what I mean then – it’s like the difference between true and false – telling a lie and telling the truth.
To one person, you believe the lie, and think that’s the truth – when it actually isn’t real. To the other person, you believe what’s true and ignore the lie. Who do we know is correct? If we are just listening to words, we really don’t. We just think we do. So in essence, we have that some people believe in lies – what isn’t true or is not reality, and other people believe in things that are correct – through understanding.
When you start to see the difference, you’ll realize what’s a lie and what is reality – what is actually true. Keep in mind, to our current reality and perception, both are true, because we believe both things. But one is actually false and one is actually true. So what can we then conclude about our reality, where both of these possibilities – the lie and the truth – can be real to us?
A lie is synonymous with something that is false. The truth is synonymous with something that is real. What do you know when you find out with 100% certainty what is true? You’ve moved completely in the direction of what is real. (The truth is synonymous with ‘real’).
This has definite ties back to religion – it’s something so many people are missing right now, it’s something Jesus tried to get you to realize, something that became hidden – and it’s up to you to realize what’s right in front of you.
For now I’ll give you an explanation, but just like with the first algebraic revision of Einstein’s equasion, it’s just a couple pieces, so you probably won’t really understand, but the reality is this is all you actually need to understand. It’s just most people need more pieces to get it, some people don’t realize they know it and are doing it, but kind of ‘get it anyway’. This means you don’t have to be a smart person to succeed at this – only the understanding of it requires explanation and intelligent thought.
I’ll give you a simple explanation – if Jesus said God is only good, God is the truth, and we still haven’t disproven the actual notion and possibility of a God, what do we then know?
He said there is no evil in God. When he was charged with blasphemy, he asked ‘what evil did I teach you, what evil have I done?’ This means many things – not only is there no hell, no eternal torture or punishment, (God is not evil, there is no evil in him, he does no evil), then what can we conclude if there is such a God, why is there such an evil thing such as hell? Why would he do it? The reality is, if you know your history, most people in the distant past believed only in a ‘better place’ – like a heaven. It took people wanting torment for their enemies, to believe in a hell. This absolute evil thing sprouted out of our imaginations as we progressed in negative thinking.
But there’s a difference. God is only good – not both evil and good – you do not need to fear it, you just need to love it. He will never do anything evil to you. There will be no hell – forget about it, even if you’re dis-appointed because of people you hate or think are evil. The reality is, if God is the truth, and God is only good, it follows logically that the only truth is what is good…
In believing in evil and doing evil things, you’ve moved yourself backwards – in the direction of what is false. If you believe only in good, and try to move in that direction, you start to become what is true. See it now?
According to God, the only truth in you is good, Jesus tried to get you to realize not only this but the difference, and we are just waiting for you to see all of this – stuff that’s right in front of you. By believing in a lie (evil), you are believing in things that aren’t actually real – according to God. What was real were the good things you did. When you fully understand this, you’ll realize that it’s a personal choice, and this leads to two possibilities about life: Either it’s like Jesus said about the fisherman – where God collects only the big fish to the next reality – meaning you realize these things, have made yourselves real like him, know what is true, and went there – and casts the rest back for a re-do, endless more attempts, tries, whatever – meaning he simply can pick you up into the next reality which is his reality after you’ve matured enough; or he simply blesses everyone at the same time with a ‘gift’, and you’ll all be in heaven immediately.
Either way, it eventually means inevitably that everyone will be in heaven – and nobody in hell. It’s a troubling thing you will have to realize, if you want to all bring peace to the world. It’s something you may not want to admit. But it was staring at you directly this whole time. Have we disproven the possibility of another reality? No. Have we then disproven the possibility that in that other reality(ies), there might be a god? No. What do we know about god? We believe he is good. Every time in religion – it’s about good vs. evil.
The two do not actually exist together – this means one is a lie, is fake, is false, and is not real; and the other is the truth, is real, etc. Since god cannot be both, and everyone agrees god is good, then the truth is in his reality there is only that which is good. Evil is no longer possible. It’s just that simple – if you only believe in what is good, you start to move in that direction. That means you become more real to god, and less false.
I guess that’s all I really need to explain about religion. Simply know that what is real about you – what I see, is that you are delusional and totally fake when you’re being bad. If you pay attention to only what is good, and show people only what is good, then that’s the reality about you, according to god. Jesus tried to tell you this. It’s a simple choice in not only what you want to believe, but what you want out of life and what direction you want to go in, and what you want not only yourself to have but everyone around you to have.
You see, real justice means everything is equal, everything is good. How is it that there will be some ‘judgement’ or ‘hell’? Are your ‘sins’ measured on a stick and if you reach a height of it, are you then tortured forever? Who even deserves 10 days of that? Nobody does, really. God is the same way, if you are an actual, legit preacher. Teaching about hell, satan, demons, negative things – these are completely, utterly, not true. Jesus simply said ‘look to my second coming…’, not ‘watch out for satan and his demons! They’re gonna getcha!’…
If you understand this, you’ll start to make sense out of Jesus’ messages. It’s a choice you’re going to have to make for yourselves. The reality is, nobody is your enemy according to yourself unless you make that person one. Hating someone is not a good thing. Nobody deserves torture, ever. It’s a shame these things happen in our reality, but it’s meant for you to see the difference. It’s what you have to understand about yourself and religion that will only result in total peace if everyone understands it.
You see, I teetered from atheism to religion (at least my own form of religion after catholicism). But I started realizing things, seeing the difference, and then everything became very clear. I’m not going to explain all that to you now, just know that Jesus actually said some very profound things for his time, and didn’t actually make any mistakes if you understand why he said what he did. That’s not to say you should rush off to try and read and understand it all – it takes a lot of thought and time, and it’s something a good, positive preacher should just tell you. Reading through the bible that is written in psalms, parables, and puzzles can be maddening. That’s not exactly what I want you to do – so I’ve changed my mind, I’m not actually going to teach you all about Jesus…
What I will simply say is this: if you want peace in the world, get smarter. Understand not only why life is important, but that people all need good things, and good things are in a good balance and evenly shared. It’s just like riches creates much more poverty than it does rich people. In god’s world, he probably didn’t want rules or laws, or even punishment; but it requires very good people. I guess if there is one he will probably give you endless opportunities to get it right, and you don’t even have to be smart.
You just have to be good. That’s it. You have to realize that negative things aren’t actually real. It’s like being a liar, or false. It’s just that simple. If you want to understand what this means, how many people can make sense out of Jesus’ sayings? Not many. But if you make this choice, and strip out all the bad things from religion, suddenly you realize that there’s a really, really good message there – and it no longer contradicts itself. Then you’ll realize that the contradictions were just to make you think, and to try and make you realize things, and to get you to make a choice.
Once you make that choice, you have something really good to believe in. Once you have something really good to believe in, you’ll want to do good things as much as possible for people. Once you understand how it all works, then you can start to work towards world peace.
What do I mean by this? It’s just like you pointing your finger at someone else – and saying something bad, or blaming them. Can you really condemn someone without considering what you yourself have done in the past? Have you forgiven yourself everything? Why not everyone else? Have you not forgiven yourself about something you did – why not? Move on. There is actually endless forgiveness for endless sins. Why haven’t you realized why that is? It’s because with true justice, everything is equal. And the reality is, what is true is that which is good. It would be evil of me, and of god, to condemn even hitler (you have to realize, hitler was actually just a victim of his childhood – people raised him to believe, think, and do exactly what he did later in life. Given a second chance and hind-sight – what would he do? Given what you know about the results of what he did and what it meant, what would he do? The reality is, given a different opportunity, he just might try and help everyone he possibly can. Why then couldn’t you forgive him?)
God loves you. That is the truth. To stand with him is to believe only in what is good, and at least try to follow that direction. That’s all that’s really required. You don’t need to understand how complex this gets unless you want to understand all of Jesus’ message, but really – you don’t need to. All you need to know is people need good things in life – so try to know the difference and spread that around.
You see, what is evil? It’s death. What happens when you start wars, kill, etc? You spread death. The end result of this behavior is self-destruction – eventually, everyone will die. That’s kind of a reality in our universe, seemingly, but it’s not actually true. It’s not actually real. But the end result of being evil is your own demise, and the end result of being good and doing good things is life and the continuance, the preservation, of life. That’s the difference. You only think that evil wins in this world because it takes bad deeds to ‘kill it off’, and people don’t have enough time in one life to change, and people don’t understand everything, neither do I, and we never will. But if people were no longer born, what’s the result of killing things in the end? Everyone dies. What’s the result of every negative thing that could happen? Everything dies. What’s the end result if everything were good, and never died? You have an abundance of life, the preservation of life, and all is good – just like a heaven.
I would argue that this world is simply what you make it. You can make things difficult for people, like people often do, or you can make things really nice. It’s actually totally up to you.
When I was at a really good college, my spanish tutor asked us a question that he said he asked everyone. It was – ‘let’s say I have two buttons. If you push the red one, some random person dies. But if you push the blue one, the last lion on earth dies – ending that species. Which would you choose?’ He said most people chose to save the lion and kill the random person. Then he said, nobody chooses to save the lion if the red button means they kill themselves. See that? Not only is it selfish of you to kill someone else to save a lion, meaning you value some lion more than your neighbor or brother just because you may not know them, but it’s also a lack of thought. What if there is only one lion left? The species is going to die off regardless of what button you press – it can no longer reproduce. What else can you see? Let’s say there are 10 lions, 5 males and 5 females, and pushing the blue button means they all die, ending the species, but pushing the red button means 10 people you definitely don’t know die. You again push the red button. Now we tell you – those 10 people were all close family or friends. See the problems here – with death? Now what if we were to tell you – we just told you to push a button on our device, that doesn’t mean you actually had to push one. What’s the result of that? Nothing happens.
That’s a fine lesson in selfishness vs. selflessness. It’s a fine lesson on perception. It’s a fine lesson on value of life. It’s a fine lesson on what action to take – if you aren’t sure about something – take no action. If you know it will result in something bad, and you don’t actually have to do anything – take no action. If you know your actions are going to produce good results, and minimize negative results – then take action. And keep in mind what’s in human nature – is sex or being homosexual really a ‘sin’? No. It’s a completely natural thing. Animals are homos sometimes. Why shouldn’t you judge? Because you are sometimes wrong, even with what you thought was indisputable evidence. Most people in prison say they are innocent – even if that’s actually a lot more than reality, it still means there are a lot of people in prison who don’t belong there.
What are we doing now with monitoring and policing/militarization of citizen oversight? We are paying so much attention to people who are actually doing nothing wrong, that we are now ignoring a lot of crime, and instead of protecting ourselves against foreigners and foreign ‘terror threats’, we are actually opening ourselves up to it. Worse, is it could lead to even more unrest, which is already rampant because of widespread poverty and a crazy work life, and also cause us to lose allies and create much more enemies. This is worldwide forced control – and only undeveloped nations know what to do about it. I just showed you why.
Currently, we are listening to warped media, from only one perspective – what people in power positions, in authority positions, etc. want you to think. What you think leads you to feel things. Your feelings lead to your decision-making. Once you have made a choice, this leads to action. See now how this works?
You see, by the media, forced control, etc. you are being fed mostly lies a lot of the time. Or inaccurate, skewed stories, information and statements. What did I observe as mass shootings started to happen? I remembered that the old shooters were called ‘gunmen’, now they are called ‘terrorists’ and ‘insane’ or ‘mentally ill’. Even with the case that the gunman had only ‘asburgers’, we concluded he was ‘insane’, and ‘mentally unstable’, and that’s why he did what he did. So I watched everyone spread FUD about every mental illness – everywhere. The more this happened, the more this spread. Now, everyone is not only afraid of these people, but they hate them all. What this did was turn all of your attention away from the facts:
It is not actually mental illness that is going on here. We’ve always had mentally ill people. There is no greater proportion of mentally ill per population than we’ve had since the 1950s – all with similar rules. Already, these people cannot buy guns, cannot own or carry guns, etc. So why give your guns away? But there was a huge discussion on that. Let’s look at the real statistics.
Let’s first look at an honest article…
The increase in mass shootings over the course of the past several decades is not imaginary. In 2000, the New York Times analyzed 100 mass shootings between 1949 and 1999 and found that 73 of them had happened since 1990. Since 2000, according to Mother Jones magazine, there have been 33 more, including the recent massacre at the Navy Yard. The majority of the killers have untreated mental illness.
What do we notice here – untreated mental illness. This means they either were not taking medications, or were not even yet diagnosed until after the crime. What else can we see? Approximately 1% of all societies, their entire population – have a mental illness. This means in America, there are at least 2,500,000 mentally ill people – and this may actually be just schizophrenia – not accounting for the wide variety of all mental illness – and that’s just going by those who are diagnosed and have sought treatment – not those who haven’t. So if all of these people live a maximum lifespan of at most 50 years today, is it a big statistic that in a 50 year time period, only 100 of them did something? No, it isn’t.
We have betrayed the mentally ill by drastically reducing the availability of treatment. America has roughly 5 percent of the psychiatric beds it had in the late 1950s. When Aaron Alexis called police in Rhode Island last month and complained of “voices” in his head and the “people who were sending vibrations to his body” with a “microwave machine,” he ought to have been taken to a psych unit for evaluation. Instead, police told him to avoid the “people” who were bothering him.
Psychiatric treatment is too difficult to get in every state. That’s why the mentally ill comprise 400,000 of the nation’s 2.2 million prison inmates and one-third of the nation’s homeless. In many states, even if the family members of paranoid schizophrenics beg police and medical authorities to commit someone for short-term evaluation and treatment, civil commitment laws forbid it.
With 5% of the availability of emergency treatment and first-response treatment – is it any wonder that gun violence among the mentally ill is rising? Add that to the fact that the mentally ill are going through times where it is increasingly difficult to go to a hospital, get prescriptions, or go to a doctor because we have forced them into poverty, and won’t pay for these things? We already see – almost 20% of all prisoners are mentally ill, and they are only twice as likely than the general population to commit any crime – throughout their lives. How does 1% of the population account for 20% of the prisoners – when statistically, they should only account for 2% of the prisoners, because they are only twice as likely to commit any crimes? Also, we can see one-third of all homeless people are mentally ill. Isn’t that a real stretch of numbers? Not only have we failed to treat and understand these people, but we’re forcing them to poverty, suicide, fear of others (they are twice as likely to be a victim of a crime than themselves committing one – if you take into account the fact that most of these people commit suicide, or are killed by ‘natural means’ – like their medications or doctors, we have the case that most of them die early by getting killed – not killing someone else. Yes, they should be far more scared of everyone else than we are of them) etc. Is it any wonder that they are fighting back sometimes? Just like a lot of our nations are doing, we’re backing these people in a corner. We’re not only failing to treat them, we’re basically killing all of them – and justifying it through fear of the ‘unknown’. This shows a complete lack of logic and understanding.
To know the real answer that I’m trying to get at, we’ll refer to wikipedia now:
Gun-related violence is most common in poor urban areas and frequently associated with gang violence, often involving male juveniles or young adult males.
What do we already see, right at the front? Poor places. Young people. Gangs. (Drugs) (Alcohol).
In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicide deaths, and 11,078 firearm-related homicide deaths in the United States.
The reality is, all gun-related violence is on the rise. And we already see why – so no further information is necessary. It all relates back to similar things. Loss of opportunity. Feelings of hopelessness. Forced control. Overbearing rules and regulation. Feeling watched all the time. drugs. alcohol. poverty. This all equates to crime. Another accurate statement from a different source: “The report found that of these possible explanations, only the increase in drug and alcohol use could account for the rise. [of violent crime by the mentally ill]“
What I am trying to tell you is this – just because one crime results in more homicides by a single gunman, let’s say it kills 10 innocent people – is that somehow worse than 10 ‘what we can consider normal’ people killing 10 different people at different times? In reality, there’s not really much difference. The reality is, take an intelligent person. He lives until 26 before he is suddenly diagnosed with something like schizophrenia. Does that suddenly make everything he says and does automatically insane, or does that suddenly make him a criminal in any way? No. You just think it does, based on your perception of that category of people…
Now further understand. That person lived 26 years of absolutely normal life. He also lived at least some time with everyone calling him insane. Now, what actually describes schizophrenia is hallucinations – the brain basically transforming sounds, information, sometimes vision, etc. into ‘mistakes’, turning what isn’t real into what that person thinks is real. Now we can understand why the older a schizophrenic gets, the less likely they are to commit any violent act. Now realize they find out with absolute certainty that these ‘mistakes’ are just that – the brain lying to them. Then they know it is just like a person telling them a lie, and further that it is just like normal thinking – only now they have to take the hallucinations out of the equasion. A smart schizophrenic can easily tell the difference between hearing a hallucination and hearing an actual sound, the vast majority of the time. The same is true if they visually hallucinate.
Now further your understanding of this person. He progresses in understanding, and actually strengthens his mind – by necessity. Since they see everyone hates him, and threatens him all the time, he has to make choices. One is to fear the rest of you, and try and predict what you are doing, in case you actually are trying to kill him, which most of you are. This only prolongs his possible lifespan, until he sees he is actually near death, can do nothing about it, and will die. Then he will either kill himself and save himself from the crap people are going to do to him, or he’ll just let you do it in whatever horrible way you are about to do. But that choice is about the same as that first suicide scenario that he had in the beginning, and by now that person has already decided to go through with it. He also has to make the choice to be as close to perfect as he can be – making no mistakes – because everyone is trying to find a way to put him behind bars, or justify either his death or kill him. He further has to make a choice whether to go through with this life, or end it early at some point. The strong minded choose to go until there is no possible way out – then they leave behind what you need to learn from their observations.
So what should we know do, given we understand that ‘insane’ people that can realize what is going on are not dangerous, add to that the fact that untreated ‘insane’ people who are also drinking or doing drugs are causing these crimes? It means the only culprit are the ones that do not understand their own ‘insanity’. It means they are just like us. To us, we can’t tell the difference. The same is true at the beginning of a mental condition – there’s a lot of things going on in the brain that are turning what isn’t real into seemingly what is real. The same is true if they were to never figure out the difference, and that is the reason why they are not taking their medications, drinking, doing drugs, etc. after they are diagnosed. That’s the vast majority of cases right there.
So what should we do? Look for the signs. In every case, there were definite signs. If someone starts talking about shooting people, that means they have already thought about it multiple times – and not only that, they have already arrived at a decision to do so. Wanting or looking for ways to obtain weaponry are another sign – it’s furthering that decision and moving towards action. But even at this late stage, you can help them.
All they need to do is realize that it isn’t real. But it’s not enough to just tell them it isn’t real. They don’t understand yet. You have to either show them, or prove it to them. This takes obviously a lot of explanation, time, and effort. They can learn this in numerous ways. I’ll give you just two examples. Let’s say you have a schizophrenic that is ‘hearing voices’. Now let’s say you make her watch british television all day for a week. At some point, they are likely to start hallucinating in british. That alone should be enough. Another way is, you can tell them to pay attention to the voices, and when they hear something that tells them somebody is doing something, they can just ask that person. It can even be an indirect question, it just has to arrive at reality. When they know that really isn’t what is going on, they have it. Or their voices may be telling them they are going to die, and also when. If they never die, obviously those hallucinations weren’t real.
In the end, you have to explain to the person that it is their mind, and these sorts of things are just like sub-conscious thought. Only now, it’s like it’s real, coming from around them. What can you do? You have to let them know that in the end, it is their responsibility to not only separate out these things from this ‘real world’, but know that these hallucinations are coming from ‘somewhere else that isn’t real – just like your imagination’, whereas everything else is just like it was before. Once they have separated them out completely, you simply just explain that in the end, they are the masters and in control of their own minds. They ultimately rule their own minds and thinking – and also therefore their decisions. So not only can they control their decisions, they can sort things out in what is really going on in reality vs. their ‘heads’..
But are the mentally ill really that big of a threat? Not really. It’s just received a lot of attention lately – that’s why I’m choosing to talk about it – the opinions on the subject are really morbid, and really skewed, and in my opinion we owe these people a big apology.
Why am I saying we actually owe them an apology? According to what I have read, the genes that cause this happen by mutations during pregnancy. That’s why you can’t ever breed it out of people. Drinking during pregnancy is also likely the single biggest factor in the exponential rise of autism diagnoses. You people are nothing more than social madness, like life is one big party now. If you continue this way, let’s see if you’re still enjoying the parties in 50-100 years.
The fact is, most of this stuff is not only preventable even with these genes, but we now know we can basically ‘turn them off’ – during pregnancy – regardless of whether or not the parent had any family history or a lot of family history of mental illness. Adding to that the fact that the most novel drug idea to-date, with the best method of action, the least side-effects, the best treatment option, potentially the most potent treatment, and also the cheapest one to produce – is an extract out of cannabis. Imagine that ‘guess’? Then imagine that Eduard Einstein was a schizo, and lived for 50 years in his time. Without much medication. Are we really doing ‘better’? Do we really think we ‘understand it all?’ Do we really think we have given these people better lives? Any kind of ‘normal’ again?
I would say we start seeing if other hallucinogenic plants have anti-psychotic effects, continue research into other, similar brain problems, find out the direct causes – and not only will we have the most potent treatments should they come up, but we can stop it from even being a possibility in life, if we can catch it in the womb. Same is true of many other types of things – I’m just using this as an example because it’s actually the worst illness. Now you see it – we do actually owe them an apology, especially when we understand them…
I’ll describe these things to you in two different ways, to further prove to you that you do not know the difference.
First, look at everything I just said, and the parts you do not understand (like the idea that mass may be the real constant, and it’s both energy and time and the speed of light that are actually variable – this flips both science and physics on their heads – and it’s actually true – I demonstrated it for you, we already basically know this, and further you can test it in a lot of different ways. What’s really going to bust your noggins’ later is, if you ask the next question – is mass really a constant either – then do we really have any? Isn’t mass just energy that has obtained a mass? Then isn’t reality an illusion, and further possibly time an illusion? Now we’re going WTF??? – exactly my point.)
Ok, so take statements like that, which are correct, make sense when you understand, and can further prove if you look up your information. Even though it hasn’t been thought or studied, we know can see it’s all a matter of perception – you just need the right one is all.
What if I say ‘I just farted so bad, that it was like whinnie the poo, muttering the word ‘grandmother’, under a pile of laundry’.
If you think I am insane, you would immediately see this statement makes absolutely no sense, and throw the whole thing out. But if you think I’m normal, you would change your opinion to ‘that’s pretty funny’. Personally, even though that statement is incoherent and makes no sense, I think these sorts of things are pretty funny – even if they are really dumb. Even that can be amusing. But to different perceptions, it takes on different reactions. We can see this going on all throughout the internet today (the internet is basically a social free-for-all right now). Me and my brother make statements like those all the time to eachother, and he says some really, really funny stuff like that – and so I take a lot of fun, enjoyment, pleasure – out of our conversations. Sometimes, laughter is a cure. But that doesn’t mean it always has to be about ‘funny’ and such..
Here’s another example I read about recently: A guy in Europe wanted to do a study. He sent 20 ‘normal’ people to mental hospitals around the region. They were instructed to tell the doctors that they heard one single voice, telling them ‘I am God’. And nothing more. As they were in these hospitals, all patients would act completely normal (no behavior problems), and carry on like they normally do. They would also keep on saying they are not hearing any voices, or noticing anything further unusual.
The results? None of the hospitals would believe them, they were all put on numerous drugs, diagnosed with numerous different illnesses, and never released until the researcher finally figured out they needed to all not only say to the doctors ‘I’m sick’, but also ‘I’m starting to get better’. Eventually, all people were released and then taken off the drugs (if they were able to). The researcher released his results to the hospitals.
The hospitals then replied back ‘we made some mistakes – send us 20 more, we’ll get it right this time’. So the researcher complied, saying he would do so. A month later, all hospitals said they had, combined, found all 20 ‘fake patients’. Then the researcher told them ‘I actually sent nobody this time’.
Now, do you really pretend to think, if you are reading this as a psychologist or a physician – that through a 45 minute discussion with your patients, you not only know exactly what is going on, but what is wrong with their brain’s activity, what is going wrong with their brain chemistry, what they are thinking that is incoherent, what is wrong with their thought process, and further what to diagnose them with? Keep in mind, we now agree that we can diagnose almost anyone with some form of mental illness today, given enough information.
Do we really pretend that we know the difference? Come on now – this is just like me asking you – given the earth’s trajectory, and our galaxy’s trajectory, and where you are standing at any point in time, do you truly know which way in reality is ‘up’, or ‘left’? Because, you don’t. You just think you do…
You see, it’s all perception. For this ‘insane person’, he has seen all sides to the ‘insane token’. He has both been normal, seen other ‘insane people’, and been ‘insane’ himself. He is the only one now that knows the real difference. He now sees all of this exactly the way it is, and knows the correct perception – because he has been there and done that, been on both the receiving end and the giving end, and knows the full difference.
In reality, to some insane people who are smart enough – it’s exactly the rest of you that appear insane to him. To him, he knows that the only reason you consider him insane is because his brain has been damaged. But he can see past that now. Your actions speak much more volume. He now knows the difference of what is real and what is not real. He can see right through it. Only you do not know the difference, because all you understand is the label ‘insane’, and he’s been labeled with it, whereas you haven’t. But he knows now when he is doing something that not only isn’t insane – but you will consider it as such.
Think about what I am saying to you here – what might you say now? You might say I am an insane person, just by understanding one and talking about it. Or you might try to prove only that I could be considered ‘insane’, and throw everything I am saying out. Either way, you are just looking for an excuse to throw all of this out as ‘nonsense’. But is it really nonsense? The only way to know for sure, is to test out everything I am saying. If you were to realize what I am saying to you, you would see that I am mostly correct in what I am saying. It’s just like how everyone treated Einstein…
What did they think of Einstein during his time? In grade school, they thought he was LD. Was he really? No – he was frustrated, brilliant, and he didn’t enjoy the stupidity of the subject or his teachers at the time. Did you know the difference? No. What did they think of him later, as he was doing all this math and saying all this stuff? They thought he was insane. But the reality was, he was being brilliant. Did they know the difference? No. The only time they knew the difference was when they could understand him and prove the stuff he put out there, but still don’t completely understand – not only his equasions – but what he was saying, especially.
Now consider Jesus, if you start to really, really make correct sense out of what he was saying – you become very troubled. You start to ask yourself – holy crap, who is/was this guy, really? Then you bounce around from an insane man, to an absolutely brilliant man, to the son of god, to god himself, to satan himself – you have no idea what the truth is. Then you make the choice – just like you did before. What kind of stuff did he do? What was he like? What was not only the immediate result of his actions, but the end result if everyone were to understand what he was doing? He basically showed you how to save not only yourselves, but everyone. In that, did he really do that much evil, even though people went nuts at it early on and started wars over it? Not really. He saved all of you in the end.
Just the same, you all may think I’m insane by telling you all of this, and tirelessly and rapidly clarifying, revising, correcting, and adding information to it. To me, it’s because the rest of you seem insane. Just like I’m driving down the road, the rest of you are actually the ones breaking the law and driving recklessly. Just like you don’t understand what I’m doing with computer science, you all appear to me like an ‘angry painter’ – throwing out things in its entirety just because it doesn’t add up the way you have it – you’re just missing pieces. Or like you are a hateful ‘inspector’ or ‘detective’. You see a gun next to a body at a crime scene – and immediately rule it a suicide – without any further investigation. To you, your authority is never wrong, and you never question what they are doing. Even though you observe them lie to you time after time, and make excuse after excuse. To you, money is a real thing. To someone like me, I know it’s basically meaningless – especially given a different way of life that we could eventually go to. To me, I know what I need is all that I could ever want – as long as what I need is freely available. Nothing further matters to me. To you, you want more than the ‘other guy’. So much so that you would kick him in the face if he was homeless, you were a billionaire, and he asked you for 20 bucks or a job.
This is in fact, what I’m seeing today. Are you smart just because you worked hard and got good grades in school? Who knows? It’s undeterminable. The only thing we did was test your memory, or how fast a reader you were, or in extreme cases, how on-the-fly you could use current knowledge to solve further problems during a 20-minute test, or read ahead enough to already know those answers. We only tested your ability to either learn something that was already done, and memorize it all.
Are you smart because you have your PhD today? Nope. It just means now that you either had enough money to go to school long enough, meaning you had rich parents, or someone helped you all the way through monetarily. Is there any difference in being ‘successful’ in this environment? The most successful people today already had money, and it just takes enough tries to not only become successful, but make even more money for themselves than they started with. To the average person, they usually can’t even afford one try.
Are you smart because you did well at a big-name university? In my state, the biggest known college was the absolute worst education. Yet their students get out and enjoy the most success. It’s not that they were well-educated, it’s that everyone perceived it as a good education. If they don’t know the school, the hiring person(s) automatically assume it wasn’t a top-ranked school. The reality is, the best schools in the state I was in during college were the least known – only well-known to companies who hired out of there before, and had very smart workers. Then we stopped valuing intelligence, and started valuing how well you do socially at work. We stopped valuing the work, and started valuing how well you are socially – how well you can talk, make friends, choose enemies, win arguments, etc.
The best way to know someone’s real intelligence at a certain point in time is to have them take an IQ test, and understand that the total, end score is the actual measure – not parts of the score. The parts just tell them what they are best at. When you understand how IQ tests work, anyone you find that scores perfect on areas like I do, that means if you cannot take a more precise measurement in those areas, there is no measuring their abilities – they are off the charts as far as we know. But that too, is a matter of current knowledge and perception – it’s biased. The easiest way to see is two parts of the classical one. One is the spatial intelligence. Your conditioning of the mind changes your answers, and what was right becomes wrong on the test, but actually you were right both ways. It’s a matter of current perception of the way you see things. The next is the fact that you can still cheat on certain areas – look at the vocabulary part. You could just look up thesauruses online or words you don’t know and find out the answer. Similarly, you could further cheat by other people telling you the ‘right answers’ to each question. So it too, has problems.
So what am I saying here? We’re going in the opposite direction in regards to where we should want to be going. We are rewarding negative behavior all over the place – and not just with money. We even choose our life partners like this. Think about it – who are most women attracted to? People that make them laugh. Or people that look good. Or people that are good at sports. Or people that are famous. Or people that have a lot of money. People that are fun. Who are they not attracted to? Nerds. People that are very smart. People they can’t win an argument with. People that correct them.
What do we value socially? The same. We reward negative actions with praise – not knowing what we are doing. We are never rewarding positive things – that is currently like charity. The most positive things today and the best things today are only to the benefit of other people – who use that to further their selfish positions.
What I am saying is, not only are we rewarding crime (just like bailing out the banks for committing serious crimes, rewarding them with infinite money, rewarding failing business, etc), we are rewarding drug use, by actors and other famous people not only making it popular and spreading it around, but we are legalizing more and more drugs. We are rewarding so many negative behaviors, and targeting who we want to punish, rather than just punishing bad behavior, and rewarding good behavior. The latter is what you should be doing, and what you should change to doing. Right now, we are all reinforcing negative thinking, which leads to negative feelings and decisions, which leads to negative behavior. Like one bad apple, this spreads, because there isn’t much reason to pay attention to good things. Adding to that, socially we have made good things other perceptions like ‘gay’, or ‘nerd’, etc. We have learned this through school and upbringing – socially. We learn how to ‘win’, by ‘defeating others’. We view everything like winning a fight, and the best way socially to do so is to ‘kill the competition’, or ‘squat on the competition’, or ‘gang up on the competition’ – by using more people, more resources, or more money. You see it all about winning, and me, me, me. I see it as you, and us, but not necessarily me. It’s no longer about me – I’ve already made my choice in life. It’s time for the rest of you to make yours.
It’s just like a war. Who’s on the right side? At the time, both sides think they are on the right side. The same is true of a football team. Who’s the right side. You blindly say ‘my team’! When actually, it’s neither.
You see, the bible isn’t exactly wrong. Even though it’s a story, with flaws – if you look at it from the right perspective, it’s almost as if those flaws were intended. Stripping them out, and you begin to realize the actual message. Then you realize things aren’t actually all that bad, and there’s really nothing to fear except fear itself – which means you are only fearing something because you fear it – not because it deserves to be feared.
Jesus left this part wide open. There’s numerous ways this could play out. In one way, he said this place was a corpse – doomed to die. In another way, he said everyone would be condemned. In another, he said everyone would be saved. In another, he said some people would be saved, and others condemned. In another, he said some people would be saved, and others sent back. Those are your options. The truth is, he also said it ‘depends on your children’s children’. Doesn’t that make it a choice? But in reality, the end result is always the same. God is good. God is the truth. The reality of this world is to have the knowledge of the difference between what is good and not good. What is true and not true. That knowledge is all that is required. Does he really need to condemn anyone? No. There are numerous ways he could arrive at a perfect society, with totally peaceful people – and not only make you a good person instantly, and cure all illness and disease – but make it an impossibility.
But there’s further information to know what to happen. Imagine I am justice itself, and God has chosen me to not only witness what you have done with life and this world, but to then judge you in the end. Even with as bad as people have been through the ages, especially more recently, how do I judge each person? Remember – I am true justice, so I must not only judge fairly, but equally. Who do I send to hell? Do I measure each person’s additive sins up and say ‘sorry, you’re just above the line’, or ‘well, you’re just below the line’. Is that fair? No. What if I were to just treat it like everyone is the same – and do the same measure, only saying now it’s all of your judgements together – as if you were one single person? I then again, measure your collective sin. Well, it’s well above that line, sorry, you’re all condemned. Is that fair to the people who really tried and did really good things, even though that is a more equal way to judge? No, again, it isn’t.
The reality of this situation is just like when my spanish tutor told me about those two buttons – the best choice is to not judge at all, and ignore everything – like it didn’t happen. That’s the one and only best way. This answer lies in the numerous translations of the ‘sheep story’. What is the correct translation of losing one sheep? I save the one and leave the flock – because the one is more important? No. Do I save the flock and leave the one – saying the one will die anyway, he is lost, and the rest of you combined mean more? No. The correct translation is I take the flock with me, and go searching for the one – because you are all equally important to me, and I cannot lose a single sheep.
The same is true with the way god sees it. Would god put true justice in a position where he would have to judge life? No. Even if he did, true justice would still not judge – and would rather save everyone. What is the result in the end if God has a hell in his reality? I want all of you saved, to know – no – visit regularly for yourselves – all the torment going on in hell while you basically get to live peacefully, but nothing more than that. I want to see if you feel comfortable knowing this is going on all day. What will happen if this continues? It will result in an uprising from hell itself, leading to a war against the two, or it will result in an uprising from the people in heaven itself, because they cannot stand what god has done, or both. Either way, you are thinking of all of this in terms of what you have been taught to know, not thinking it out for yourselves. The answer is – the best way to sustain peace is to make it impossible for bad things to exist, begin to exist, or grow.
Evil and good, in god’s world, absolutely cannot exist together. Otherwise, you have the exact same conditions as this world. Is a peaceful heaven sustainable in heaven if there is also evil? No. There will be, just like our reality, endless wars unless people finally realize what’s right, everybody follows it, it’s always taught to people, it’s always reinforced, and you never stop going in that direction from generation to generation. God has better ways, quite simply. Just like the sheep – if I have a way I know of that I could keep on creating more sheep, without losing any of them, that’s the best answer – and there are multiple. Only he knows exactly which one is best already.
Now I want you to imagine this – what if a government was watching me say all of this to you? Would they be scared if you realized not only what I am saying, but what I am doing? Maybe. But if they understood me, and were honest with themselves – what are all of them not only doing, but seeing right in front of them that is going on within their own nations? They are absolutely self-destructing their own nations. Given a better way, why wouldn’t they choose to find answers to their problems? Given that they could do like Roosevelt, and save the current way of doing things given the gutsy resolutions – don’t you think they could all stand up and do that? Yes – you see, there are multiple ‘correct’ answers to all of our worldwide problems. Only most people already are sure that their leaders don’t understand what they want, and won’t do what’s best for them, so they ask and demand that they step down. Does that mean they want them dead? No. They just want them to move aside and let themselves lead their own country in whatever direction they collectively feel is best. But what happens as the person in that position tries to hold on to power? More destruction, more violence, more killings = more angry people, wanting a bigger punishment – because now the crimes against them are much worse.
When hitler rose to power, in England, who was fit to be a true leader? Was it the older brother, who was always riding his younger brother, throwing parties as ‘king’, and doing a lot of other negative things, who also sided with hitler when he became ‘king’ for a short while? No – he wasn’t fit to lead a nation. Was it the younger brother, who was always being picked on, told he could never be king, never really wanted to be king, had a speech impediment, couldn’t talk in front of crowds – but was forced to – it’s as if surely it is impossible for this person to be a king – he can’t even talk! The reality was, that person was King Henry, and he was very much so equipped with all the experience, and strength, and drive and the knowledge to know the difference to be more than capable of leading his own people.
So do I care if a government doesn’t like what I am saying – because it could cause them to lose power? An honest government wouldn’t care. One, this is best for all their people. Two, they don’t have the answers. Three, most of them aren’t evil. Four, the people of their nation actually have more power than they do. Five, they could just do similar things for their people, like their people want. Six, the military could do this. Seven, the police could do this. Eight, any member of the justice system or any other branch has the same power as any other branch. So we may as well see it like it is, and start implementing society the way things really are – everyone has the same amount of power, given any group acts in unison. It’s that simple. So why not just put your people in power, and then there is no question what direction your nation is going in – all people share all power both individually and collectively, the nation moves as one, and there is no question who made the decision – the people made it unanimously. United you stand, divided you fall. Learn the difference.
Now if you were to imagine an all-knowing, all powerful being – that was only thinking of what is good, and already made this decision simply because he could think through it all and know it before making any movement or action – don’t you think he has a similar way? One that doesn’t require anyone to die? One in which everyone with enough experience and attempts could get this right? One that doesn’t matter how every ‘fake’ reality plays out? One in which by the time people arrive at his reality, this is possible to not only arrive at good things and good people from the start – but also ensure that it never goes in that direction ever? Yes, there are numerous ways to do this. But there is a best way. Whatever way that is – that is likely the way god has chosen, if there is one.
You see it now? To me, you all look like angry painters, you all have lost your ability to think.
What am I trying to say? We are distorting our conclusions, because we are basing our feelings, thoughts, and decisions on distorted observations, facts, and information. We have a very nasty view on certain groups, and like to blame other people for all of our problems. Further, we are applying the wrong corrections to this, because we have such a distorted view. It’s just like looking at only one piece to the jigsaw puzzle, or being an ‘angry painter and making a mistake’, etc. It’s all the same. How can you blame over 2,000,000 people and consider them a ‘threat’ when only a very small fraction of them are doing anything wrong? The same is true of all this monitoring – we view certain groups and people as a ‘threat’, when actually, most of them are the ones trying to help everyone else, and actually aren’t doing anything wrong…
Consider Occupy – were they correct in their statement ‘the 99%’ and the fact that we have a problem with income disparity in the US? Yes, they were right – even in Europe. Income disparity alone creates this situation – money is a limited resource, even with rampant printing. The more a small segment of society gains, say 1%, that leaves a lot less for everyone else. The wider this disparity gets, eventually there is not enough money for everyone else to sustain the economy. There are multiple ways this could end. In the 1930s, it ended with Roosevelt having to flat out tell rich people to ‘start doing your jobs and create jobs’. Or else he was going to tax the living crap out of them. They didn’t listen. So he taxed them at close to 90%. As they then created jobs, with the agreement that they eventually lower their taxes, we started growing our economy, more people got back to good paying jobs, and eventually we got back to normal times. Nothing else actually played anything close to as big of a factor as that – it took the rich people finally owing up to their obligations. Everything else the government tried was drops in the bucket compared to that.
But occupy were treated as ‘a terrorist threat’. If you care to look up the information, you would see that anyone involved were being monitored closely, and even spied on directly by homeland security – even at event meetings. These people were nothing more than protesters – trying to do something positive and good. The government made them look incoherent, insane, and bad. You just didn’t know the difference, because all of you are trained to ‘believe what you see, not what you think’, and ‘believe what we tell you, not what you know’, and you don’t look for further information, you just take things at face-value. And you never question authority figures. That’s why the occupy movement was an absolute disaster – it wasn’t because occupy wasn’t a good thing for a good cause or purpose, it’s because the public wasn’t paying attention to what was going on, had a distorted view, didn’t understand, and then didn’t care. You listened to lies, and made it real for yourself.
Now even environmental protesters, hackers, and even wal-mart protesters are considered ‘terrorists’, and immediately detained, arrested, and potentially beaten or tortured. Yes, we now have a problem in the developed world – and a lot of other countries are following suit. The reasons why there is civil unrest all over the globe is for similar reasons – their ‘authority figures’ are going way too far, and to the people that know what to do about it – they are fighting back. They will not be forced into a corner, they know there are better ways, and they are tired of all the crap.
Think about it this way: what have I noticed, that the rest of you should have all noticed, about something as simple as driving? More people are speeding now than they used to, and further they are exceeding the speed limit at a bigger pace than they used to, on average. It’s like everybody now just has to speed. I still drive the speed limit, because I understand what happens if I don’t – I could get in a wreck. I could overdrive my headlights. Go around a turn too fast. All of this means I have less reaction time, and my reaction time doesn’t get any faster than it was when I was a child. The speed limit is there because it was determined by the city/state that it is the maximum safe speed to travel given the road and conditions you are traveling on.
But now I can’t even drive down a one-lane highway without people flashing their high-beams behind me, swerving into oncoming traffic blindly to pass me – even though sometimes I speed up to 5 mph over the speed limit for them – they pass me anyway. To all of these people, I am the one with the driving problem. To me, I’m the only one driving safe and the rest of these people are driving more dangerously than they used to.
There is a huge increase, a real statistical thing – about drunk driving, texting, and its relation to fatal accidents. But we haven’t decreased the number of people who are driving drunk or texting while driving – we’ve only done that to a small degree. And people think if they can get away with it, it’s ok. This is why a lot of people are speeding, and also driving dangerously, more now than 5 years ago. They aren’t getting in trouble. So they think they can ‘get away with it’. They don’t care. But is that the real reason for what they are doing? Do I care if I speed? Not really. I just understand why I shouldn’t. To they care? No. But they don’t understand why they shouldn’t. With that kind of thinking – it’s obvious why they speed. They only see their selfish thought process, there’s a lack of punishment, so they not only don’t care, but also don’t understand, and are listening to bad things going on in their mind, their feelings, etc. It is negativity by the person, and the lack of punishment for that negativity, that allows them to increasingly break this law of traffic.
But what else does this tell you? Since all this monitoring and profiling of certain ‘targets’, we’re ignoring as officers what we are supposed to be doing in the first place – enforcing safety. Serve and protect – not find ways to incriminate ‘targets’ or ‘perceived threats’. That’s like a switch from ‘innocent until proven guilty’ to ‘we’re going to make you guilty’ or ‘guilty until proven innocent’ because ‘you are our target’ or ‘you are our enemy’ or ‘we hate you’ or ‘we want you gone’.
But what else should be just as easy for you to see. What reward is there for me to consistently drive safely, all this time? The only reward is a lower car insurance bill. But the reality is, as safely as I drive, I’ve only been in a wreck one time in my life. I’ve been driving for over 16 years, every day, for at least an hour a day. I love to drive – it’s relaxing, I get to listen to music, and I get to smoke like I’m indoors. It’s nice. It’s like stepping out for some quiet, alone time for me. And I love the smooth ride. But there was one time, in the city, where I took my eyes off the road for just a couple of seconds to flick my cigarette ashes out the window. When I looked up, I saw a light turn from green to yellow. Then I looked down a little, and the guy in front of me slammed on the breaks. Oh shit! Barely hit the back of him, enough to total my car and put a dent in his bumper. Then he got out and said he was from out of town, was lost, and wanted directions. I said – look at my car – do you really think I’m about to tell you where to go or how to get there?
But still, it’s only one wreck in 16 years, and nobody got hurt. It wasn’t a major accident. But it taught me to never exceed the speed limit – even by 5 mph. Just because unexpected things do happen, people can pull out in front of you or make similar mistakes, and you need to take speed into account for the amount of time you can stop or avoid hitting that other vehicle. Now that I understand, I am an even safer driver as a result. But I still get pulled over for not using a turn signal, or following another car ‘too closely’. WTF? If you put a camera on the front of my car you’d see reality, occifer!!
Do I ever get rewarded for safe driving? Just a little smaller insurance payment is all. But the reality is, I’m paying for everyone else’s wrecks. Does that bother me? Not really. Because I know we are just sharing the cost. Even though I’m not getting what I put into it in terms of money, at least I’m not stuck paying for everything in one moment. Not only does it spread the money and the risk for those of you who wreck a lot and I’m footing the bills for, but in the moment I’m not stuck with a huge bill that I didn’t expect. So no – I don’t really mind.
But if that’s the only reward for me driving safely, is society really doing me any favors for doing something good like that? Think about it – what is the reward if a physics or religious person reads all of this, proves parts, and does something with it? You get recognition, or a medal, or a little money. Is that what’s important to you? If getting your name out there is really that important to you, or being remembered – that’s really selfish and really shallow. If that’s all the reward society can give you for doing good things, how is that any different from the reward of writing software for free?
The fact is, we usually reward negative behavior – and as Keynes noted, we do this with money. Money seems to be the biggest motivator for people. It again, is like worshipping false idols. It’s a perceived form of value. But there actually is no value in it. If I were to switch gears, and revise your whole society, money worldwide would have a lot less meaning, and I could make positive thinking, feelings, and behavior have a lot more meaning. I could give out rewards in abundance for good deeds and behavior, instead of basing good deeds and behavior like charity work, for someone else’s benefit. I would spread that sort of reward and teaching of understanding and behavior to such an extent, that there wouldn’t be much need for punishment. Remember – fear or punishment doesn’t play a big role for good or really smart people. The only meaning it has to them is ‘I messed up’ or ‘I made a bad mistake’. In my type of society, it would constantly push the bar in the opposite direction we are going in now. Instead of decensitizing you to negative things, and conditioning you to think of things in worse and worse ways, always competing and thinking you are ‘winning’ and it’s ‘us vs them’ or rather ‘us vs him’; I would be giving you really good things, conditioning you to think of better and better things, and rewarding all of it. In my world, we would be moving to a constantly better and better place, not regressing into a worse and worse place.
If you know your history, you can see right now we are right in the middle, but are we really better people than we were in the past? I can’t really answer that. It seems like we have progressed, but the mind hasn’t. It’s time we broke the cycle. It’s time we realized – this isn’t working, we need to try something new here. This requires new ways of thinking. new ways to solve problems. ideas.
So you see, it’s all a matter of perception – you just need the right perception in order to understand the difference. You don’t seem to know the difference in things, but you think you do. I’m explaining not only why, but how to change that. You can recondition your minds. You can teach new things. You can understand new things.
You need to understand: most of you cannot imagine how to control people unless there is some form of punishment. You think the only thing that keeps you in line is the threat of punishment. For bad people and negative thinkers – that is the only thing that keeps them in line in this reality.
The case may be that it may be a requirement in this world. You cannot simply ignore punishment and just reward people – because that would open up bad people to do anything they want over and over. But you’ve got to get with the times. We now know slavery is bad. We still know riches create poverty and the downfall of societies. Every warrior eventually wants peace for everyone. If you train people to be good all through life, and place in rewards and punishments, but do not overpunish, you will strike a fine balance.
Eventually, this means most people will start to move in the direction of what is good. Then, you will maximize reward, good things for your people; while minimizing the need for punishment, and bad things for your people. You see, good things can spread just like bad things. While one bad apple can ruin the whole bunch, one good apple can bring the whole bunch with him. It just depends on who the bunch wants to listen to, what they want to believe and do – and that is the general direction. You are always either leading or following someone else. Start knowing who to follow.
Just keep in mind the more sustainable way is to make better people – not try to control bad people. You have to spread good things – not spread bad things. You cannot force control through fear, but rather you will limit crime through peace. The more you create better thinkers, better people, and better societies and environments, the more you can teach people, the more you spread things around. And just like one person can learn to move towards the edge of what is ‘perfectly good’, but never arriving at perfect, you can teach the whole world as a body of one people to eventually move in that direction. While you never arrive at world peace, you will get close eventually. That’s how you will sustain this place and these lives.
But first, you’ll have to realize there are choices, and a fight. Not only will you know why you are fighting, but what you are fighting for. Are you fighting for yourselves, out of anger or hate – calling people your enemies? Or are you fighting for what you know is good, right, just, and will benefit not only your nation but all life on this planet. See the difference? Even though it requires you to do bad things, sometimes it is necessary. It’s the understanding of what you are doing – and why you are doing it, that’s the point of these existences. And we give you endless tries until you get it right. Patience is a good virtue. If I were God – why would I need to send you to hell, if I could do anything? Why would I need to risk losing lives? If I wanted a perfect world, a perfect society, what do I need? People who understand. Brothers. If I am all alone at the beginning, what’s naturally the one thing I want? More distractions. More people like me. But I can’t have bad things – how do I solve this? By giving people endless tries, and creating more and more each time, so as to always get more and more people in my society, without actually causing anyone to die as a result – eventually, everybody will get it right.
It’s just as important to preserve those around you as it is to preserve yourself. You need to understand the value of life, and know the difference.
But quite simply, if you want a good place and a good future and a good world and good things for everyone – the answer gets no simpler than this: learn what is good, try to do what is good, and know the difference. It doesn’t get any simpler than that…
So what also am I really doing here by not only telling you this really, really long post – that most of you will not read, not understand, and call me names for; but some of you just might catch on, get it, spread it around – and even though I gain nothing good out of it, but might actually get some bad things out of it – and even though I am not remembered – what am I really doing? Exactly – I see you no longer have the time to do this yourselves. I’ve seen what you do to these kinds of people – you kill them off. Everyone who could have made a huge impact, that people either didn’t like, or wanted gone, was destroyed. That limited the amount of good they could do for you – but you never realized they were trying to save you.
In the moment that you know how your enemy, you know how to destroy him. But in that moment, you love him. What if I were to tell you there is one more step – to then know how to save him? So what am I really doing here? I don’t want to see a corpse, I want this to be very successful, at the least I want to show you the ways of peace. But you have to remember – just like a ship headed to another planet – you are running out of time to do this yourselves. What I am actually trying to do is not only correct the course of this world, but also speed up the results. I am trying to speed up time on you, basically – because you no longer have time to do all of this on your own.
Now what did I just do? I taught you how to think for yourselves. I taught you what you think you know, given more information, may actually be wrong. I taught you one person may know better than a lot of other people. I taught you this is not about a popularity contest. I taught you to be smart. And I just flipped two big subjects – physics and religion – on their heads – in only 5 days. I was trying to get so many people to listen to me – because it was only for the best for them – not me. I am watching you destroy yourselves, in so many ways. I want you to listen. I know better ways. So do other people. I am trying to show you who to follow. But you still won’t listen. This is just like me seeing that big, black tree in you, and realizing it is not real, and replacing that ‘void’ with a new seed. Basically, I am sowing a lot of new seeds for you right now. I want to see, who you all really are. Are you finally going to listen? Because the reason I am now blogging about this instead of telling you directly is because this is the LAST time I am going TO SAY THIS….
It’s just like I’m your older brother, and I have already walked through the valley of darkness. I’ve been through the forest, the fields, the desert – everywhere. We made it across. I know the way. I came back for the rest of you, and just like before when it was me, I’m tirelessly trying to convince you – you have to get over the trees. You have to take the steps. Really – this is the right way. Don’t go over there. What are you doing? Tirelessly, I try to explain to you that there’s a door here, it’s opened for you, all you have to do is walk through. It’s just that easy. But you won’t budge. You just keep pacing back and forth in front of the door. I keep repeating myself, over and over, trying to explain if you would just walk through that damn door already – you would be in a better place…
Still, nobody listens. And I suspect not many will even listen to this. It will probably be lost, this will result in a corpse, and I still have no idea how to handle such a loss of a harvest….
You do not know who you are talking to. You do not know what’s right in front of your eyes – what’s right in front of you. And you do not know how to handle this situation. Tap-dance your heads on that one for a while. And just like I did with Jesus, realize when you start to question – who was I really? Was it just someone sent to you in disguise? Did he really come to observe us? Or is he Satan? Is he insane? Or is he brilliant? Just understand I am trying to make you choose. That choice boils down to something simple – but no simpler…
I want you to choose between good and evil. good and bad. equal or selfish. selfless or selfish. All it boils down to is a personal choice. Am I taking every precaution in regards to every possible outcome? Yes. What’s really important – the next life? Or this one? They both are. But don’t worry too much about what comes next – you are here in this now. So it starts with what you want to believe. You cannot serve two masters, so you have to choose one. Will you choose good, or bad? When you believe in only one, walk down that road – the rest of your days. You will slip. You will make mistakes. Never will you be perfect – that’s not the point. The point is the journey. When you reach the end of that journey, that is where we will be waiting for you.
In other words, if you realize what I am saying, the end of the journey is to find out who is standing right beside you. When you go through that ‘door’, you will realize you are actually only standing at the beginning. God stands at the beginning – not Jesus, not me, but the Father. In other words, do we get to say what is to happen here? No. We can only profess you and what we chose to see to the Father. Ultimately, it is the Father who will choose your fate. Because He is the real truth, the real light, the real power, and He is the only one Master – the only One above All. The rest of us are only brothers. Sons in comparison. We are all equals – not one above or below the other. But the Father is the one above all of us. This choice is always deferred to Him – because only He knows the way. In the end, where there are any questions, even if we think we know or are absolutely sure – He does know the reality, in absolute truth. Therefore, true justice will not even decide. The son will not even decide. The son’s brothers will not decide. God, the Father, your Master – will.
Now, I guess I need to further explain myself here, just in case. What did I just do? I threw myself directly on the cross, just like Jesus did in reality, only this time just with words – ideas. Then I said – ‘Now, choose!’. Then I gave you a very clear reason to not fear us, but to fear God. Then I say it again ‘Now, Choose!’. Who are you? What are you?
You all came from God, inevitably. You are all cut from that same cloth. But you sewed something that wasn’t from god into that cloth – you introduced evil. That’s why when you know the difference at least, we can replace that entire cloth with the same as the original, only now you know the differences and the implications of those differences.
The reality is clear, I am not only sowing seeds, but fertilizing the soil. If you fully know the implications of choosing death in full, and following that way in full – what does that tell me about you? You are totally, utterly, lost and delusional. If you choose good in full, and at least try to follow it, knowing full well in this life it is an impossibility to be perfect – what does that tell me about you? You are trying to stand with God. But you are like baby – you don’t know how to crawl. Then you don’t know how to walk. Now that the information is out there (the trough is no longer empty), and I am dividing you into two again – what will you do?
Do not be a God-fearing man. Love your God above all else. Do not be a hateful man – that only leads to bad actions. Do not hate your enemies – you never reach peace. Even though you may get angry, at least know why you are angry and what you are fighting for. Are you fighting for what’s really right? Are you fighting for what’s really good? Just like a deer has more power and punch than a cow, you then think that animal is an evil animal. You just didn’t realize that it was actually a really good animal – it’s just that it has a lot of unexpected strength and drive.
Why did I choose to teach you about physics and religion? Because it allows me to prove something to you. For scientists, it should show you not only are you partly wrong about some things, and the way you think and perceive things – but the same is true of your ‘opponent’. To religion, the same. Now why can’t you start to respect each-other, now that you fully understand one another? Aren’t there some very valid points to make in both. Are either completely false, or wrong? Are either completely correct or true? In this reality? You do not know how to consider which way is ‘up’.
Now do you see why I’ve been so frustrated with so many of you all the time? Do you see why Jesus was trying to forgive all sin by dying on the cross? It just proves you are blind. But there will come a time when you are not blind. Then, what will you do? Which extreme will you ‘try’ to move towards, intentionally? Either way, it’s a choice you’re not only going to have to make for yourselves, but a lot of people are going to have to choose life over death – over and over – as much as possible. Not only with themselves – do not commit suicide if you can help it – but with others – do not kill if you can help it. Learn to sustain life. Learn sustainable, fair, equal, and needs-based societies. Come up with better ways. Evolve in the correct manner. It’s just that easy, once you see it.
Oh – also, does this mean I think I came from heaven, to observe life and where it has gone? There’s an age-old saying ‘know thyself.’ Who am I, really? Am am simply, right now, a human. So was Jesus. Did that mean he was not actually the ‘son of god’ or the ‘son of man’? Who knows? Does that mean I actually think I was sent here from heaven to do this? No, I don’t. But then again, I am doing this – here and know – and why. And I know in the end, we all came from God. In a sense, you were already in heaven from the beginning – you just had to realize it first. If you know the difference now, make the choice – and choose wisely…
In case you still don’t understand – I’ll give you some more pieces to the ‘judgement puzzle’.
Also, in case you missed it, I gave you the ‘keys to knowledge’. You have to look at it from God’s or Jesus’ eyes. Then you are looking at it from the right perspective. What do they do? They are only good. They always choose life. They never kill. That is simply the ‘key’. When you apply that to the ‘meaning behind his word’, you will understand. Given that you understand everything I am saying during this religious segment – am I directly giving you the ‘secrets behind the sayings of his?’ Yes, but not all. The keys and the choice should be enough for any of you to then eventually understand the true meaning behind his words, and if you’ve payed close enough attention to me here – I gave you a bunch of them.
I even thought given this type of reality, that eventually we would end up with only evil people – meaning we would eventually reach a point where everyone is ‘bad’, intentionally – but I was wrong about even that. The reason was simple – given another opportunity, and the absence of the ‘former self’, you do something different – even with the exact same situations. Nothing happens the exact same way twice. In affect, this reality can keep going on and on, what is removed can be replaced and built on, further people can be sent to guide you, further you may do the exact opposite choice next time, even though right now you may say ‘I am evil, so I can keep doing this over and over, and it will be fun to me’. At some point, you’re going to be the poor man. At some point, you’re going to be the receiver of a lot of negative things in life from other people. You will choose differently. The more knowledge you gain, the more correct your choice. The more knowledge you gain, you will inevitably choose the right thing. That one time is all it takes – even with infinite failures.
So here’s some more pieces. Jesus said ‘I will condemn everyone, and when people ask ‘didn’t we prophesize in your name?’, I will say ‘I did not know you’. He also said he would send everyone to the hell-fire. Then he also said ‘I will baptise everyone in fire, in the holy spirit’. Then another statement ‘If you deny me to my face, so too will I deny you in front of my Father’. Then again, ‘Heaven is a gift given unto you, by the Father.’ Then again, ‘You can blaspheme against the Father, and you will be forgiven. You can blaspheme against the Son, and you will be forgiven. But blaspheme against the holy spirit, and you will never be forgiven – in Heaven or on Earth’. Then again they say ‘In the end, it will be plainly visible who the ‘tares’ are (the growers of bad seeds)’. Then they again tell you ‘The number of satan, the number of man, is the number of that creation – 666′. Why is your number the same as satan? Does this mean you are all evil, all condemned?
What does all that mean? It very much so seems to contradict itself from every angle – right? Not exactly. You see, if we’re all different people, trying to get you to make a choice for yourselves – life over death. Good over bad. Truth over evil. Through giving you a reality where you don’t know the difference – you will eventually figure it out.
This means one thing: People were blind. But the more observations given, the more truth was visible. When you know the truth, you might condemn not only me, but Jesus and the Father. But that is still ok – we’re giving you every possible opportunity. The last opportunity is when you think you are being condemned, but you are actually walking right through the holy spirit. It will show you your sins, you will experience your sins. It will show you where you were good, you will get to see these things again. If you still, after all of that, deny good, and choose evil – then you have exhausted every opportunity, and this go-around, you will not enter heaven – this makes you what is dead, a corpse.
But what do we do with ‘tares’? Do we need to kill them? No. Where you see dispair, we still see hope. We can simply wipe out your life, leaving only distant memories. Then you live a new life. Even though you said last time ‘I am evil’, or ‘since we are both good and evil, and god made us in his image, he is both good and evil’, or you even Dare to say ‘god is evil’ – the latter two mean only you are blind, incorrect, don’t understand, and aren’t ready yet. So do we need to torture or kill you? Nope. We can simply send you back. Do you really want to live in a place that can do such horrible things to you in this life forever? I would hope your answer is eventually – I want to go to heaven.
To do that, you have a simple choice, and it is like a light you can never switch off. That is life over death. Good over evil. It’s just that easy. I’m making this as simple as possible for you, but no simpler. Now that you understand, and dare call God ‘gay’, or ‘evil’, or anything of that nature, I am angry at you – very angry. People may call me these things, and I will overlook it – but nobody calls the Father these things. Then you may call the Father these things, and He will forgive it, but nobody Dares call themselves these things after experiencing the holy spirit, and there is no further excuse – the fault is your own.
But there is still hope. There is endless times. Eventually, I will call you my ‘brother’….
Just some things to consider – before you blindly lead and send so many of us diving off that cliff…
End of story – end of discussion. Good day!